Legal to backstab and use side terminals?

Status
Not open for further replies.
"look at (3) home run boxes to see if there are pigtailed neutrals"
Like I said in my post, if there are no pigtails in the homerun boxes.

I must be blind, because I do not see that anywhere in your post. What I see is
When I inspect jobs that don't use pigtails, I take a look at the homeruns by the panel
.


How many neutrals can you backstab into the back of a plug ?
Two, right ?

maybe. maybe backstab two and wrap two. There is a debate about that going on in another thread.
Our company policy is to not use the backstabs, so we wrap the wires. (unless the device is made to use a compression type screw clamp).
This means we have room to wrap a maximum of two wires. So if there are (3) 14/2's in a box, we pigtail all (3) whites and all (3) blacks.

So if you have a HR box with a 14-3 and the two circuits leave that box and snake around the house, how many Romexs are in the box ?
At least 3, right ? So you must have a pigtail.

I agree.

On the rough, if I see one or more boxes with the following:
1) 3 conductor HRs at the panel
2) a box with two 3 conductor Romexs or one 3 wire and one 2 wire
3) no neutral joints made in that box
then you either have a receptacle violation of 300.13(B) or a missing neutral joint at a switch location.

Either way it's a violation. Something is missing !

And when I write it up as a 300.13(B) violation, the contractor needs to come back and add whatever is missing.

We have a kitchen in a recent rough that has, among others, (3) 14/3 homeruns.
(1) is for the dishwasher/disposal; (1) is for the wine chiller/beverage center; (1) is for the warming drawers. The neutrals are pigtailed in the homerun boxes.
In the livingroom, there are (7) split-wired receptacles on one 14/2 home run. Some of these boxes have (2) 14/3 wires in them and they do not need to have the whites pigtailed.

According to your words, if I don't have a guy there, and you see 3-wire homeruns hanging at the panel, you are not going to pass the job, because we typically do not pigtail all of our boxes.
That is outrageous.

I stand by my statements:
To not approve a job because of your lack of time, is outrageous!
:x

It is NOT my job to hold your hand and lead you around to show you that I am in compliance.

If you do work that I inspect, you don't have to hold my hand. You just have to do it right.
David
I guarantee that if my company does it, it will be done right, but you need to look at it anyway.

In case you forgot, here's your statement:

When I inspect jobs that don't use pigtails, I take a look at the homeruns by the panel. On the rough, if I see any 3 wire HRs and noone from the electrical contractor is on site, I won't approve the job. It's the responsibility of the contractor to prove that there are no neutral pigtails missing from the shared neutral circuits. I don't have the time to track thru every box in every circuit in the whole job. If the contractor wants to skip using pigtails, it's his responsibility to show that he complies with 300.13(B).
 
Just like CSI if an inspector decides that there is a violation then it is his job to show there is that violation.Just because the I think theory is in many inspectors heads doesn`t mean that that is the way it is.Does there have to be a rep from a EC ???? No way.If an inspector wants to check something then he should be quite capable of doing the labor after all that should be why he/she is there in the first place.I posted awhile back that I did apround 19 finals with the chief inspector in a couple of hours.But when we started he asked me to go ahead of him and open the panels and close them behind him that way we could get through this.Me the chief and 1 helper and even though there were a couple of burried devices we passed all finals and safety was not compromised :D
 
allenwayne said:
Just like CSI if an inspector decides that there is a violation then it is his job to show there is that violation.Just because the I think theory is in many inspectors heads doesn`t mean that that is the way it is.Does there have to be a rep from a EC ???? No way.If an inspector wants to check something then he should be quite capable of doing the labor after all that should be why he/she is there in the first place.I posted awhile back that I did apround 19 finals with the chief inspector in a couple of hours.But when we started he asked me to go ahead of him and open the panels and close them behind him that way we could get through this.Me the chief and 1 helper and even though there were a couple of burried devices we passed all finals and safety was not compromised :D
I did 4 finals today in 15 minutes.We wear our company t shirts for more than just respect to the boss.I want the inspector to know who stands behind our name and it gains trust.
I did look today at a box of P&S and it said nothing other than to be installed by an electrician or OTHER QUALIFIED PERSON.Left me thinking just who that would be :? :? :? :?
 
ty said:
"look at (3) home run boxes to see if there are pigtailed neutrals"
Like I said in my post, if there are no pigtails in the homerun boxes.

I must be blind, because I do not see that anywhere in your post. What I see is
When I inspect jobs that don't use pigtails, I take a look at the homeruns by the panel
.

"When I inspect jobs that don't use pigtails, ....."
What don't you understand ?
If they don't use pigtails, they don't use pigtails. So when I look in the HR boxes I see ..... no pigtails because ..... they're not using them.

I don't know how else to explain it.

ty said:
In the livingroom, there are (7) split-wired receptacles on one 14/2 home run. Some of these boxes have (2) 14/3 wires in them and they do not need to have the whites pigtailed.

According to your words, if I don't have a guy there, and you see 3-wire homeruns hanging at the panel, you are not going to pass the job, because we typically do not pigtail all of our boxes.
That is outrageous.

Split wired receptacles have Romex running to a switch box. Believe it or not, I wired hundreds of houses before I was an inspector and can tell the difference between a homerun box and a plug box with a split wired feed.

ty said:
I stand by my statements:
To not approve a job because of your lack of time, is outrageous!
:x

It is NOT my job to hold your hand and lead you around to show you that I am in compliance.

This is not about a lack of time. It's about wasting time. I'm far too busy to waste time. If the HR boxes are not finished then it's a waste of time to go thru all of the joints thruout the whole house.

If the HR boxes need work, I leave a note to check all boxes and make sure the whole job complies with 300.13(B). That does not mean that I'm demanding neutral joints where neutrals joints are not required. It means that it's the contractors responsibility to check his work and determine where he needs to make changes to comply with the writeup where I list 300.13(B).

David
 
scwirenut said:
bad advice, please dont do this, pullout the box, install a deep old work box, pigtail, or walk away.............horrible advice

Most of my customers don't want their wall all torn up to get old box out. They just want an additional outlet with as little expense as possible. IMO it is better to install it even with slight overfill on old box, using pigtail to new duplex in old box and to new installation.

They are either going to use extension cord or get some hack to do the job. I come across a job like this mostly in older homes with metal boxes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top