It doesn't say hubs listed for grounding and bonding. It says listed hubs. Either the code wasn't properly written and should be revised, or UL is just going overboard. If this statement from UL is right, then there's no need for 250.92B2, as the hubs with the ground lug would meet 250.02B4. The code requires following instructions with listing and labeling, but doesn't say follow every email from UL. UL has made new product listings through this procedure before................................
As an example of why I think the fact that it says listed hubs vs hubs listed for grounding and bonding matters, look at 250.8. It says you can use listed connectors for grounding and bonding (i.e.: wire nuts and not necessarily greenies) That's not a license to say it has to be listed for grounding and bonding, as is evidenced by the fact that some proposals have been made and rejected to change it to that. If that's the proper interpretation for 250.8, then why in 250.92 do we come up with a new idea of not accepting "listed hubs" and requiring that they be listed for grounding and bonding.
If UL is right on this, then bonding locknuts are also against the code? They are usually used for over 250V, and service entrances. UL Whitehbook even says they can be used. The time they can't be used without the wire would be when there's something like eccentric or concentric knockout. Otherwise, ULS says they can be used on the line side of a service.