Looking for opinions

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Looking for opinions

As far as doing the work T&M, if the job only takes one hour would you only bill for the hour ?
If the job takes 1 hour including traveltime, the bill should be billed for 1 hour, if the job takes 1 hour not including drivetime, the bill should be 1 hour + 1/2 to 3/4 hrs drive time, but I have a hard time with the $200.00 min per hour OUCH! :cool: :cool: .

[ December 17, 2005, 06:49 PM: Message edited by: Jhr ]
 
Re: Looking for opinions

T and M is my favorite type job.If your not making money this way then something is very wrong.Last week i did 20.25 hours of it.And i know i made my boss plenty.Travel time is part of the job as well as the paper work.$200 min is just flat out wrong.But its up to you if your willing to risk loosing his work.
 
Re: Looking for opinions

$200 min is just flat out wrong.
Assuming my guess as to the original posters location is correct, I don't think that is out of line. Two hours labor and a bit of material would place the normal billing for that location in the $200 range.
Don
 
Re: Looking for opinions

Originally posted by don_resqcapt19:
$200 min is just flat out wrong.
Assuming my guess as to the original posters location is correct, I don't think that is out of line. Two hours labor and a bit of material would place the normal billing for that location in the $200 range.
Don
This is not as much a question of he EC deserving the money as it is the pricing structrue.

A flat show up fee does not go well with regular customers. A good contractor averages those costs and builds them into his hourly rate for prefered customers.

Yes the EC still makes the same ammount of money, but there is not line item on the bill for "I showed up $200.00"
 
Re: Looking for opinions

Assuming sparky 134 means local 134 out of chicago, a $200 fee is entirely reasonable for that area. There is alot of money in the big city, You just have to take it. ;)
 
Re: Looking for opinions

sparky has to fill in his location.... i am just saying build that into your hourly cost.
 
Re: Looking for opinions

Originally posted by sparky 134:
On the first inspection the AHJ requested a receptacle be installed in the mechanical room...
That's your mistake, 210.63 and/or 210.52(G).

...and a light installed under the stairs for the sump pump.
That I can take sympathy on, but it can be considered required by 210.70(C)(3).

On the second inspection the AHJ requested three receptacles be installed in an area that was deemed to be unfinished storage on the print but the carpenter studded the walls therefore the AHJ said the receptacles were required.
Now, that's a crock. It's unfinished space, studs or not. Fight it.

Now, some have said that these should have been included originally. In the past I have made suggestions to the GC about add'l work I think the AHJ would require and was told to just bid the drawing.
I'd suggest you bid the plans to code. If the plans didn't show the proper amount of outlets for an area (that honestly needed them by code), would you bid short, plan on backcharging later and take it in the shorts?

Nine times out of ten, I'd imagine that once you had your foot in the door, the GC would appreciate not getting dinged for change orders every house, because of a stupid statement like "bid to the plans, not code." GC's always make retarded statements like that, haven't you noticed?

Just ignore those idiotic requests, and when you turn in the bid, give them a wink and let them know that you took the initiative in a postive way and will not be dinging them every five minutes for another $30.

You've got to sell yourself man, don't let the stupid numbers make it or break it. The guy with four teeth and a $20 shorter bid will lose the bid if you can display qualities that would make up for it.

But I am a peon. :)
 
Re: Looking for opinions

Originally posted by KyawaComm:
Now, that's a crock. It's unfinished space, studs or not. Fight it.
Not where I live.
Thats to bad as the NEC describes unfinished space like this.

210.8(A)(5)Unfinished basements ? for purposes of this section, unfinished basements are defined as portions or areas of the basement not intended as habitable rooms and limited to storage areas, work areas, and the like
So the outlets the inspector required (that they should not have) will need to be GFCI protected. :p
 
Re: Looking for opinions

210.52(G) will require one receptacle installed.

last half of 210.52(G) Where a portion of the basement is finished into one or more habitable rooms, each separate unfinished portion shall have a receptacle outlet installed in accordance with this section.
If this wasn't on the print at the time of bid, it's billable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top