Re: low voltage & line voltage
The actual ?basic rule? is:
300.3(C) Conductors of Different Systems.
(1) 600 Volts, Nominal, or Less. Conductors of circuits rated 600 volts, nominal, or less, ac circuits, and dc circuits shall be permitted to occupy the same equipment wiring enclosure, cable, or raceway. All conductors shall have an insulation rating equal to at least the maximum circuit voltage applied to any conductor within the enclosure, cable, or raceway .
(Yes, I know the FPN refers to 725.55(A))
I have great hopes that pulling Art 725 from a CMP that is dominated by the communications industry will eventually return it to some sanity with regard to POWER LIMITED circuits. There is no actual safety issue preventing
conductors of a 120 volt circuit from being in the same ??cable, cable tray, compartment, enclosure, manhole, outlet box, device box, raceway, ?? with
conductors of a Class 2 or 3 circuit even if the 120 V circuit is insulated with 600V wire and the Class 2 or 3 circuit is insulated with 300V wire.
The original protectionism that was developed in Art 725 for conductors was over
signal quality not inherent safety. The true safety issue is isolating the terminations so that the ?unregulated? power would not ?flash-over? to the Class 2 or 3 power supplies.
Dick Biermann, currently
member emeritus of the TCC and its former Chairman was previously the Chairman of CMP16. He and I have had some long discussions over this and he appears to have been the lone voice against some of the current Art 725 excesses.
Some Art 725 circuits may also be Art 800 through 830 circuits of course. Those are the articles where it is appropriate to apply the signal protectionist rules. Other protectionist rules such as emergency signaling are adequately addressed elsewhere. Many of the Art 725 rules are grossly excessive. Originally 725 was intended to provide "looser" wiring methods because the circuits have much lower probabilities of causing a fire (see their definitions). An entire new Article (727) had to be developed, with the intent of returning at least some of the original 725 intent.