LarryFine
Master Electrician Electric Contractor Richmond VA
- Location
- Henrico County, VA
- Occupation
- Electrical Contractor
Yes. It's the main breaker in the sub-panel that is not required, but is permissable. If this sub-panel were in a separate structure, then both would be required.bencelest said:In other words, do I need to install another 100 amp breaker at the main panel to protect the feed wire to the 100 amp sub panel if there is already a 100 amp breaker factory installed on the sub panel.
The breaker in the main panel, which supplies the sub-panel conductors (the feeder), is there to protect the feeder's conductors, not the panel itself. However, the sub-panel must be rated at least as high as the breaker-feeder combination.To me I am confused now because before, all I need was a breaker at the main panel to protect the sub panel, now there is already a breaker for the sub panel when I bought it to serve as main breaker.
No, the breaker at the main panel must be sized to protect the feeder it supplies. It must be the "weakest link" in the pathway from the main panel to the sub-panel's terminals.Do I need another breaker at the main installed the same rating as the breaker as the sub main?
Make sure that's the version of NEC your locality is using.I am not familiar with the 2005 NEC book yet and I am still studying it.