Main Breaker Vs. Main Lug

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't believe there is an article that tells you when to use a main lug versus a main breaker panel.

It is a design decision. I don't believe you are ever required to have a main breaker panel at all. You can always put some other disconnecting means in front of a MLO panel to satisfy any disconnecting means requirements.
 
mesarush1 said:
When can I use a main lug sub-panel vs. main circuit breaker? What article covers the rule?
This is not an easy question to answer because there are many possiblities. For arguments sake, lets say you have a service feeding a single dwelling. Once you leave either the main panel or the main disco then all the other panels in the house can be main lug panels---the panel will be protected by the breaker at the service.

Hypothetically, I could have one main breaker panel or one main disco feeding 10 panels in the house all with main lugs only.

This does not mean that I can't have a main breaker panel if I want one.
 
Dennis Alwon said:
Hypothetically, I could have one main breaker panel or one main disco feeding 10 panels in the house all with main lugs only.
Hypothetically, would that violate the 6 disco rule?
 
Dennis Alwon said:
Yes, the main disco can't feed 10 panels directly but it can feed one which in turn feeds 9 others

A single main disconnect can feed as many main lug panels as you want.
 
Pierre C Belarge said:
Why not?

There is some guidance Art 408, Part III.

Celtic was questioning me hypothetically about the 6 handle rule. I was trying to comment on that by saying you couldn't have the 10 handles as your main disco. I didn't word it well-- if you read my other post I think it makes more sense
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top