Bagram Sparky
Member
The source is a 100 Kva generator used for permanent, spot generation. This supplies a 400 amp, 4-pole transfer switch. The transfer switch supplies the Square D, I-Line panel which is named, MDP-1.
The generator did not have an internal bond so, a main bonding jumper (MBJ) was installed. It is an oversize 500 MCM MBJ.
A 4 conductor, 500 MCM with a 1/0 EGC cable is installed from the Gen Set (10 linear feet away) to the transfer switch and from the transfer switch to the MDP-1 ( 3 linear feet away).
The generator has a 400 amp main breaker.
Each piece of equipment has the appropriate grounding electrode and GEC installed.
I have been instructed by the O&M provider to remove the EGC from the transfer switch to the MDP and add a MBJ to the MDP rather than maintain the installed 5-wire system (120/208V). According to 250.30, I am required to install a MBJ at the source or the first point of disconnect.
I find no requirement for me to change the established 5-wire system back to a 4-wire system from the transfer switch to the MDP.
I have been through article 250.28 and 250.30 and I request a clear interpretation of why this might be required.
Respectfully submitted, Bagram Sparky
The generator did not have an internal bond so, a main bonding jumper (MBJ) was installed. It is an oversize 500 MCM MBJ.
A 4 conductor, 500 MCM with a 1/0 EGC cable is installed from the Gen Set (10 linear feet away) to the transfer switch and from the transfer switch to the MDP-1 ( 3 linear feet away).
The generator has a 400 amp main breaker.
Each piece of equipment has the appropriate grounding electrode and GEC installed.
I have been instructed by the O&M provider to remove the EGC from the transfer switch to the MDP and add a MBJ to the MDP rather than maintain the installed 5-wire system (120/208V). According to 250.30, I am required to install a MBJ at the source or the first point of disconnect.
I find no requirement for me to change the established 5-wire system back to a 4-wire system from the transfer switch to the MDP.
I have been through article 250.28 and 250.30 and I request a clear interpretation of why this might be required.
Respectfully submitted, Bagram Sparky