Minuteman
Senior Member
- Location
- The Sooner Nation
Loaded up neutral may be technically incorrect yet a shock recieved from the load side of the ballast could through the making and breaking of a highly inductive load push the voltages much higher than being shocked on the line side of the ballast. Supply voltage straight up. Often getting shocked on the neutral is more of a surprise factor in my opinion. This wire is grounded so it is safe. Oh btw just dont break the ckt.It's from the Stupidest Comment thread.
If he had bent over the end of the wire before pushing it it wouldn't have likely landed inside the wire-nut. I agree we shouldn't be working live, but sometimes we cut corners. Glad hes ok.
That 277 is bad, esspecially a loaded up neutral.
I look at it like this: The grounded conductor is insulated for a reason, and I treat it that way.Often getting shocked on the neutral is more of a surprise factor in my opinion. This wire is grounded so it is safe.
I look at it like this: The grounded conductor is insulated for a reason, and I treat it that way.
Hidden 277v hot above a tee bar ceiling, me on an 8' ladder, left hand on a 1/2" EMT, right hand pokes onto the hot wire, with elbow blocked by another conduit.
FWIW I strognly dislike these "The neutral is more dangerous than the hot" and "277 is really bad" characterizations.
Any amount of current over 5 milliamps is lethal! It does not matter if that current arrives on your body from a grounded, ungrounded conductor, a 120 volt circuit, a 277 volt circuit, or a 480 volt circuit...it will kill or injure you nonetheless.
And for my vote 120 VAC ain't safe either.