Re: maximun # of disconnects?
There is a lot of confusion with the terms being used for 230.2, occupancy being one of them.
Because of the multiple use of the word by dictionary definition, the only way to resolve how the CMP meant for the term to be used is to contact the NFPA. But I will take a stab at it myself.
230.2(B) Special Occupancies.
This section is not as liberal as many think it is. First, special permission is required. Second the restrictions are intermingled among other sections, this section does not stand alone.
The last sentence in 230.2 is very specific and overlooked a lot. The exceptions to 230.40 are quite restrictive and do not give as much relief as most would like to have.
Then we have the term 'occupancy', which is not quite spelled out in the NEC, so it becomes an interpretation in the field. What really needs to be done is get an interpretation from the NFPA.
My take is that occupancy means different types of tenants such as different offices, stores, etc... where the office might need 3 phase 208v and the other occupancy in the building may need 3 phase 480v, therefore two different services (230.40 Exception 1).
I do a lot of work in multifamily buildings, and the meter banks are fed by different feeders, not different services. There is one main ahead that could be feeding either different banks of disconnects (which feed different meterbanks) or directly feeding the meterbanks.
230.40 Number of Service-Entrance Conductor Sets. Each service drop or lateral shall supply only one set of service-entrance conductors.
There are exceptions, but they are very specific - don't forget how the last sentence of 230.2 affects exception # 2.
Otherwise I do not see how a multifamily dwelling can have a separate set of service entrance conductors serving each meter bank, with its own set of disconnects. The only reason I can see for this would be the space requirement, where there are many apartments and not enough space in each meter room. Then 'special' permission is required.
Pierre