But out of phase so they can't be the same phase. Ergo, you have more than one phase.Because V1-to-N is a sine wave, and V2-to-N is a sine wave.
But out of phase so they can't be the same phase. Ergo, you have more than one phase.Because V1-to-N is a sine wave, and V2-to-N is a sine wave.
Therein lies the crux of the debate. I would say it as "V1-to-N" and "N-to-V2" instead. You're "artificially creating the inversion" when you keep one theoretical probe on the neutral while moving the other theoretical probe to both, or opposite, sides of it.Because V1-to-N is a sine wave, and V2-to-N is a sine wave.
Meaning that, for this one instance, what is a polarity phenomenon merely resembles a phase shiftThe essential difference between the voltage functions, can be seen as a shift in time. A shift in time between periodic functions, is called a phase shift. That's why one might see it as two phases, even though it is instead generated by mirroring the first sine wave around the V=0 axis, instead of shifting it by 180 degrees along the time axis.
But, they're not out of phase. They couldn't possibly come from a single transformer if they were. Every winding on a single transformer core is in phase with all of the others.But out of phase so they can't be the same phase. Ergo, you have more than one phase.
Therein lies the crux of the debate.
They are 180 deg out of phase.But, they're not out of phase.
For a pure sine wave. Add any even harmonic, and they are no longer 180 degrees out of phase. But they would still be negatives of each other.They are 180 deg out of phase.
This isn't a debate, it's a silly argument that will not change anyone's mind. Pass the popcorn.
Because they are 180 degrees out of phase.For a pure sine wave. Add any even harmonic, and they are no longer 180 degrees out of phase. But they would still be negatives of each other.
But, they're not out of phase. They couldn't possibly come from a single transformer if they were. Every winding on a single transformer core is in phase with all of the others.
Like batteries, you must get the polarity correct when combining them. That it's AC doesn't change this, since they all swap polarity in sync twice per cycle; instantaneous polarity.
The same reason a universal motor works on AC or DC.
Because they are 180 degrees out of phase.
No.Because they are 180 degrees out of phase.
You made my case. Very eloquently.No.
Suppose due to harmonics the L1-N voltage is of the form sin(x) + a*sin(2x) [for some constant a and where I've set other constants to 1 for simplicity]. What's the L2-N voltage for an idealized center-tapped transformer secondary:
1) sin(x + pi) + a*sin(2(x + pi)).
2) - sin(x) - a*sin(2x)
In this case the two answers differ. And (2) is correct, (1) is incorrect.
Cheers, Wayne
A transformer that creates a balanced audio signal from an unbalanced one works exactly the same way as a transformer that creates 120V - 0V - 120V from a single phase of power. Its output is the signal and the inverted signal, and they are colloquially called "180 degrees out of phase" but they aren't because every frequency is inverted. No amount of phase shift can do that.
But I said that nearly 1200 posts ago, didn't I?
You made my case. Very eloquently.
Are they 180 degrees apart?He debunked your case, very eloquently.
Just going for post count now?
Are they 180 degrees apart?
That's just yes or no.
And (2) is correct, (1) is incorrect.
Yes. Two phases (with respect to time) in a single phase(with respect to function) system. GLAD I AM ABLE TO COMBINE TWO CONTRADICTORY COCEPTS INTO ONE! That is dialectics of development.Are they 180 degrees apart?
That's just yes or no.
It only resembles an offset in time; it's an opposition in instantaneous polarity.Yes. Two phases (with respect to time) in a single phase(with respect to function) system.