"Don't get me wrong, it is good to see an inspector who cares about the industry and the men, I am just curious how you handle all of the other issues that must pop up."
Not a fixation, but more of a aggravation or irritation.
It's not the materials, it's the various and variable terminologies.
For years, there has been a AC cableing system that can be ordered with a green ground and is therefore approved for hospital uses, but I come here, or wherever and mention this and I'm told by people in the know that HCF is the proper cable and it is not AC.
I'm sorry to say that I don't agree. It is AC......
1. The code does not refer in any way to HCF.
2. The code does refer to AC and does list it as approved for healthcare if it meets certain conditions.
3. AC refers to the cable armor construction, not the wire within. All of it is THHN.
4. Therefore, the code recognises that HCF is AC cable and in order to "keep it simple stupid" it has declined to mention the various labels used by the industry.
5. HCF is very simply put as AC cable with ground.
The following is a paragraph from the AFC cable systems pocket guide that is mentioned quite often on this forum, so I use it as a demonstration since everyone probably has seen it of has it.
This is on the top of page seven and I quote verbatim......
"Type AC cable is available in standard AC, AC-Lite (aluminum) or Health Care Facilities Cable (AFC's and KafTech's HCF-90 and it's aluminum version HCF-Lite)
HCF, or Hospital Grade cable, is constructed in the same manner as standard AC cable, but with the addition of a green grounding conductor."
It then goes on to explain the relation to the various code sections and why it meets the requirement for healthcare.
It is the manufacturer who labeled and named this version of AC and as per usual, the terminology debate rages on, as it did with BX and the numerous descriptive terms that electricians like to employ.
Just like Doctors and other proffessionals, we pride ourselves on our knowlege of terms and love to see it happen when someone shakes their head and says, "what are you talkin about?".
The code had to read through all this and get back to bascics, where it refuses to mention HCF and treats it for what it is, a redundant manufacturers term, lie a set of Klines, Dikes or Duck Tape.....Even a Wiggy!
All I try to do, as a representative of the code, is to force the conversation back to basics where everyone is on the same page. And that is all I am trying to do now, and like a pit bull, I rarely relent when I know that I am right.
HCF is indeed a version of AC.
And although I have never laid eyes on this new Hospital grade MC, I can probably predict that it is a new version of AC cabeling because the term MC and bonding jacket are not synonomous as it is with AC, so it must be constructed like AC cable and would be viewed by most as a confusing term to use and the code would be required to address it if problems persisted in the field.
This sort of thing is one of the inspectors worst nightmares when it comes to avoiding misunderstandings. We need to use the correct term to define what we do. When several brand names become synonomous with descriptive terms, the communications suffer.
I was once asked by a job forman if I had had much experience with "RobRoy"?
I was working in various parts of the country, but the term eluded me and I did not want to appear stupid, so I said yes....I assumed he was asking everyone the same question.
This time it turned out fine, because about ten minutes later I saw a truck enter the gate with a rack loaded with "Plasti-Bond" and I had bent, cut and threaded tons of the stuff for Brown and Root. But others were not so lucky, and I soon discovered that I was the only Journeyman with experiance on that pipe, and I had to tutor everyone else. It caused delays and the job time was slower as a result of learning the devious nature of this product.....
So yes, terms are important.
That's about all I have to say on the subject, and I think I'll leave it at that.