redcatjack
New member
Is there a reference in the 2005 code for the need of anti shorts when using MC cable?
POWER_PIG said:I wonder why they are required for AC cable?
Do you know the difference? Im not really sure...Metal Clad vs, Armored Clad....Ive read the def. for both, but I don't understand what really makes them so different.
That's the line from the classroom, now let me tell you what reality is... There is one particular MC connector that has an oval shaped opening in the bottom. Certain cables that it is clearly rated for will pass nearly completely through that hole. It doesn't self bush for crap! The so called "take all" connector, that takes them all, but doesn't do an especially good job at any of them.Pierre C Belarge said:If the installer is using the proper fitting for MC cables, the fitting has been designed to perform the same function as the anti-short bushing (redhead). That is why the redhead is not required.
mdshunk said:That's the line from the classroom, now let me tell you what reality is... There is one particular MC connector that has an oval shaped opening in the bottom. Certain cables that it is clearly rated for will pass nearly completely through that hole. It doesn't self bush for crap! The so called "take all" connector, that takes them all, but doesn't do an especially good job at any of them.
Yes, I was peeping in the windows, and I want to publicly encourage you to wear clothes from now on. Nobody wants to see that.Pierre C Belarge said:HEY...have you been spying in on my classes?:grin:
mdshunk said:Yes, I was peeping in the windows, and I want to publicly encourage you to wear clothes from now on. Nobody wants to see that.