- Location
- Tennessee NEC:2017
- Occupation
- Semi-Retired Electrician
Unless it's one of the AFCI brands that the GF portion was removed. GE and Eaton being a couple of them.An afci will indeed trip on a N-G bond in the branch circuit
Unless it's one of the AFCI brands that the GF portion was removed. GE and Eaton being a couple of them.An afci will indeed trip on a N-G bond in the branch circuit
Siemens plug on nuetral but not the pigtail breakersUnless it's one of the AFCI brands that the GF portion was removed. GE and Eaton being a couple of them.
No it won't.A plug tester will.
Pretty sure it won't. Not unless it is a combined AFCI GFCI. Might vary by brand and model.An afci will indeed trip on a N-G bond in the branch circuit
Then niether would a continuity test.No it won't.
Siemens plug on nuetral but not the pigtail breakers
Right the ones where the neutral doesn't land on the breaker no, but if the neutral goes through the breaker, a N-G will trip it. (Forgot about the no neutral ones, only come across those a couple times).Pretty sure it won't. Not unless it is a combined AFCI GFCI. Might vary by brand and model.
The combined AFCI GFCI are best referred to by their proper name Dual Function because the second generation of AFCI is properly known as a Combination breaker because it is supposed to be able to protect against parallel and series arcs.Pretty sure it won't. Not unless it is a combined AFCI GFCI. Might vary by brand and model.
The long nails used for foam popouts on the front of houses..The time it takes to test the circuits is, imo not worth it. When we used to use 1000' reels we ohmed it out before we pulled it. Probably not a bad idea but the only issues I had from the factory were very visible. I have installed many miles of nm cable and I have never had an issue with my wiring unless the siders put a 16 penny sized nail thru it.
I don't believe that "having a neutral terminal on the breaker" = "performs some GF detection and will trip on a N-G fault". I recall one brand of single pole AFCIs advertising that you can use them on an MWBC, and just to land the neutral on one of the two units, doesn't matter which.Right the ones where the neutral doesn't land on the breaker no, but if the neutral goes through the breaker, a N-G will trip it.
Fair enough. Perhaps I don't use those types or brands that have that (lack of) functionality. All I know is for me, a N-G fault pretty much always trips an AFCI breaker immediately.I don't believe that "having a neutral terminal on the breaker" = "performs some GF detection and will trip on a N-G fault". I recall one brand of single pole AFCIs advertising that you can use them on an MWBC, and just to land the neutral on one of the two units, doesn't matter which.
Cheers, Wayne
My point is that the code requires wiring integrity. How do you do that? Some might think testing of some sort.I am not following Ron, can you elaborate?
ok, you said "devils advocate" so i wasnt sure if you were pro testing or anti-testing.My point is that the code requires wiring integrity. How do you do that? Some might think testing of some sort.
I am only pro-testing if not testing results in a failure and hurts someone.ok, you said "devils advocate" so i wasnt sure if you were pro testing or anti-testing.
250 volt should be good for 120 volt circuits.So, what voltage are you going to megger at? Are you meggering before device installation, because most devices top out at 250 volts, and I don't know if meggering at that level tells you anything.
Nice standard, but who adopts this? Maybe a company policy?For the work we do, we require insulation resistance testing per NETA ATS Section 7.3
Certainly. To be most effective, other trades such as siding would be completed first. But of course no one is going to like more coordination and timing requirements.testing after rough-in to me seems a little pointless because it's everyone after me who might cause a problem.