gar
Senior Member
- Location
- Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Occupation
- EE
211213-2334 EST
I might know input horsepower, but I may not know the output HP.
.
I might know input horsepower, but I may not know the output HP.
.
Pretty close211213-2334 EST
I might know input horsepower, but I may not know the output HP.
.
The motor nameplate gives you the HP output.211213-2334 EST
I might know input horsepower, but I may not know the output HP.
.
In some VFDs at least, the torque is calculated for you and available to be read via an analog input.211214-0850 EST
Output HP = output Torque ( in #-ft ) * RPM ( in rev per minute ) / 5252
Is torque proportional to input current? Possibly roughly. Sometimes fairly close, and in other configurations grossly in error.
.
It depends. Many of the applications for us were DC shunt motors and, for those, the current and torque varied linearly. For other motors like cage induction motors the power factor was typically 07 or 0.8 but the efficiency was 95% including the variable speed system. That said, my expertise is just in the industrial field.211214-0850 EST
Output HP = output Torque ( in #-ft ) * RPM ( in rev per minute ) / 5252
Is torque proportional to input current? Possibly roughly. Sometimes fairly close, and in other configurations grossly in error.
.
It depends on the application. Many of ours were cube load for pumping stations. Typically the loads were 70% - 100%.I set the VFD to give me a 4-20 ma output for power. A couple test truck loads of 14 %+ moisture corn showed 88% power. Todays lower moisture of 13% ran us up to 110% power. Slowed up the grain to +90 power and torque monitor showed in the +90 % as well.
I don't know how well the power and torque will relate at lower speeds
Ah, OK. A lot of the paper mills we did were constant torque - some of the time............Augers. Constant torque.
I was looking amp vs power earlier and set it up for power. I really don't know which would be better. I do know no load amps was about 12 with Power about 25. I didnt check torque.I'm still curious why power rather than torque?
Jon
Torque times power is speed ( RPM. ) At standstill torque is zero speed.I'm still curious why power rather than torque?
Jon
Torque times power is speed ( RPM. ) At standstill torque is zero speed.
For fixed speed it would. For variable speed it would be limited.Agreed.
ptonsparky is monitoring a variable speed auger to catch an abnormal condition.
My guess is that an overload will best be seen in the torque. In the extreme case you cited, power is zero at zero speed. So if something is jammed on starting you wouldn't see much increase in power consumption but torque would be high without rotation.
Jon