OK. Give your opinion.Gentlepeople...
Anyone interested in why, IMO, some forms of 'power' should not be called 'power'?
Phil
OK. Give your opinion.Gentlepeople...
Anyone interested in why, IMO, some forms of 'power' should not be called 'power'?
Phil
Nope. Power is just power.
My dog is black and white.
And my wit was wasted.........energy is energy
force is force
nonsense is nonsense
When calculating actual power drawn by the motor, I would use nameplate data over NEC tables.
However, if I were sizing overcurrent protection devices I would use the NEC tables.
From my (limited) experience so far is that values in NEC tables are almost always higher than the nameplate data, and that is for safety purposes. Better to be oversized than undersized.
It depends on what you mean by "actual power".
To measure actual power, one would use a watt meter
To measure power for nec purposes, one would use the fLA from the nec tables.
To size a motor to say an off grid inverter or generator, or to size conductors for voltage drop, I would use an amp clamp while the motor is running at the load it will see in service (then there is the inrush which is another topic)
When saying 'actual' power, I mean the Watts that are consumed by the motor while it is running, used for efficiency purposes. You are right, to get the most accurate reading you would take a watt meter and measure the incoming power.
But if you do not have a power meter, then to calculate efficiency I would take motor hp x 746 to get output power. Input power is voltage x current (nameplate) x pf. Divide output power by input power and you have efficiency. All I was saying is that motor name plate FLA would give you a more accurate number for efficiency, because FLA values in NEC tables are often higher. Plus no two motors are the same.
What do you need to know the efficiency for? I think you would need a dynamometer to get an accurate efficiency measurement.
S in va total POWER
P in watts active POWER
Q in var reactive POWER
Gentlepeople...
Anyone interested in why, IMO, some forms of 'power' should not be called 'power'?
Phil
Oops...what I meant was how to calculate the motor load in watts to populate the panel schedule.
I believe you need to recognize facts, not what you want facts to be.
S in va total volt-amps
P in watts POWER, portion of va doing work
Q in var portion of va NOT doing work
That va is higher than watts increases losses in conductors.