The OP was respectfully coming here to ask a very basic question, "What is motor slip." So I am pretty sure he didn't understand the difference between asynchronous and synchronous.
Exactly.
The OP was respectfully coming here to ask a very basic question, "What is motor slip." So I am pretty sure he didn't understand the difference between asynchronous and synchronous.
Actually, the discussion, being that it would pertain to his question about SLIP, should preclude discussing synchronous motors at all. "Slip" ONLY pertains to asynchronous motors, so essentially the OP had delineated the discussion from the outset. That however didn't stop it from heading off into the weeds....
The OP was respectfully coming here to ask a very basic question, "What is motor slip." So I am pretty sure he didn't understand the difference between asynchronous and synchronous.
No worries mate. I understand the point you were making. I was just trying to convey why your point may have been missed.I don't have a minor problem and this is very frustrating. Read the thread.
The synchronous motor has current injected into the rotor making it a different animal then when rotor current is only induced into it.That doesn't jive with this statement that you made "So synchronous motors can't produce any torque? :?" If the discussion was only about asynchronous motors by assumption then that statement wouldn't have been made. Because it was in response to a statement that an asynchronous motor theoretically running at synchronous speed would produce no torque. So you are the one who dispelled the "assumption that the discussion was limited to asynchronous induction motors in the first place, and the sole reason I said what I did.
The OP was respectfully coming here to ask a very basic question, "What is motor slip." So I am pretty sure he didn't understand the difference between asynchronous and synchronous.
imho the op was not looking for a math or physics treatise on slip
only a conceptual or perhaps even a literal definition