Multi-Family Dwelling Calculation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Npstewart

Senior Member
lol. He signed this project back in 2006 so he was registered. He was up for renewal in Florida I think in February of this year and he never renewed. Probably for the best. His PE number in Florida 10,000 something, pretty old. In Florida, they are up to almost 80,000 for license numbers.
 

Npstewart

Senior Member
So, after this calculation is fixed, it would be permissible to apply demand factors in accordance with 220.54 & 220.55 correct?
 

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Semi-Retired Electrical Engineer
So, after this calculation is fixed, it would be permissible to apply demand factors in accordance with 220.54 & 220.55 correct?
Only if you use the "standard method" for the entire calculation. Those demand factors are within Part III of article 220. The optional methodology is in Part IV, and tells us you can use it instead of the method in Part III. You can't mix the two methods.

Edited to add: I suggest doing the calculation both ways, to see which one gives you the better (i.e., lower) result.
 
Last edited:

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Semi-Retired Electrical Engineer
Please clear up one question for me. Does the value of 5960 represent 65% of the heating load (i.e., has the demand factor been applied, in determining this value), or is it 100% of the heating load?
 

Npstewart

Senior Member
Each unit is equipped with a 5KW electric resistance heating element, plus the fan which I will estimate to be 960 watts (tenitively), which will make a total HVAC load of 5,960. If we take 65% of that, that will put us at 3,874, that is what he should have used for the number under "Air Conditioning"... If you total his numbers up, he doesent use the 5,960 number. For some reason he used a 58% multiplier for the AC...
 

Npstewart

Senior Member
This project is a nightmare...

I went through and did a quick re-calculation using the original EOR's load calculation template and fixing all the errors. The final calculation result came up to 803 Amps....I wish it was a little higher so it would be easier to justify replacing 800A services because of 3 amps. (see attached). Im going to have to go through this with a fine tooth comb.
 

Attachments

  • Load Calc Revised.pdf
    78.3 KB · Views: 0

david luchini

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Engineer
This project is a nightmare...

I went through and did a quick re-calculation using the original EOR's load calculation template and fixing all the errors. The final calculation result came up to 803 Amps....I wish it was a little higher so it would be easier to justify replacing 800A services because of 3 amps. (see attached). Im going to have to go through this with a fine tooth comb.


Your "correction" is incorrect.

The original calculation for the multiple dwelling units was correct. You have 4 units at 37747 VA each and 8 units at 37735 VA each for a total of 452868 VA. 41% demand for that per 220.84 is 185676 VA, 774A @ 240V single phase.

The house loads should be added to that. If the house loads are truly 64 Amps, then your total is 838 Amps, not 803 Amps.

If you don't know how the 64A house load was arrived at, I'd recalculate that number. Maybe its sufficiently low that an 800A service would be OK.
 
Last edited:

david luchini

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Engineer
If the house load keeps you above 800, maybe you could look at using an 800A service for the apartments and a separate service for the house loads, possibly under 230.2(D).
 

Npstewart

Senior Member
I dont understand how I am incorrect.

For the feeder calculation I have the following


Unit A
Misc loads & appliances: 32187

Air conditioning: 3874

= 36,061 x 8 = 288,488
-------------
Unit B
Misc loads & appliances: 32175

Air conditioning: 3874

= 36,049 x 4 = 144,196

288,488 + 144,196 = 432,684 Total VA

So: 432,684 *.41 = 177,400 Demand

177,400 @ 240-1 = 739 A + 64A(house) = 803.2 Amps
 

Npstewart

Senior Member
David, I think thats a genius idea. We could do a 100A separate run to the transformer with #3 wires for the house panel. It can be terminated in the same spot and be considered one service because they are grouped!
 

charlie b

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Lockport, IL
Occupation
Semi-Retired Electrical Engineer
I dont understand how I am incorrect.
I haven't checked any of the math, but you are incorrect because you are making the same error that I had thought the other engineer had made. You are taking a 65% demand factor on each heating system, and then later on taking another 41% demand factor on the whole building. Therefore, you are double-dipping the demand factors. Try the service part again, this time including the entire 5960 VA times the number of units, then apply the 41%, and see what you get. It will likely be well above 800 amps.
 

david luchini

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Engineer
I dont understand how I am incorrect.

For the feeder calculation I have the following


Unit A
Misc loads & appliances: 32187

Air conditioning: 3874

= 36,061 x 8 = 288,488
-------------
Unit B
Misc loads & appliances: 32175

Air conditioning: 3874

= 36,049 x 4 = 144,196

288,488 + 144,196 = 432,684 Total VA

So: 432,684 *.41 = 177,400 Demand

177,400 @ 240-1 = 739 A + 64A(house) = 803.2 Amps


Didn't you say your space heating load was 5960 VA per unit? (In post #25?)

So...

Unit A
Misc loads & appliances: 32187

Fixed electric space heating: 5960

= 38,147 x 4 = 152,588
-------------
Unit B
Misc loads & appliances: 32175

Fixed electric space heating: 5960

= 38,135 x 8 = 305,080

152,588 + 305,080 = 457,668 Total VA

So: 457,668 *.41 = 187,644 Demand

187,644 @ 240-1 = 782 A + 64A(house) = 846 Amps

(I notice you upped the disposal to 1000VA from 600, but you also swapped the quantity of units from A to B. Was this intentional?)
 

david luchini

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Connecticut
Occupation
Engineer
David, I think thats a genius idea. We could do a 100A separate run to the transformer with #3 wires for the house panel. It can be terminated in the same spot and be considered one service because they are grouped!

I would expect that you'd have a different "rate schedule" for the apartments (residential rate) and house loads (commercial rate)? I seem to remember designing a project with a separate service to the house panel in the past.
 

Npstewart

Senior Member
Ok, your definitley correct, I forgot to take the AC at the full value, but, if you subtract the house service, its still relatively far from 800A! :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top