I looked up your energy code. No as bad as CA but you have to learn to live with it.
Ok the code says this. And please don't shoot the messanger.
ELECTRICAL POWER AND LIGHTING SYSTEMS
[FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman]404.1 Lighting equipment (Prescriptive). [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman]A minimum of 75 percent of the lamps in permanently installed lighting fixtures shall be [/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman]high-efficacy lamps[/FONT][/FONT][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman][FONT=Times New Roman,Times New Roman]. ]
Then it says by definition of High Efficay:
HIGH-EFFICACY LAMPS. Compact fluorescent lamps, T-8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent lamps, or lamps with a minimum efficacy of:
1. 60 lumens per watt for lamps over 40 watts,
2. 50 lumens per watt for lamps over 15 watts to 40 watts, and
3. 40 lumens per watt for lamps 15 watts or less.[/FONT][/FONT]
SO in other words you do not use INCANDESCENT or HALOGEN!
You are asking to change the speed of light. There is no way currently to get an Efficacy of 60 Lumens per watt with Incandescent. Hell with a CFL you get about 70 lpw.
You do have alternatives but it appears that your GC and architect have been asleep at the Drawingboard. There is a perfomance based alternative. It appears to be similar to CA in some respect that allows the entire structure to be used in the energy calcs. if you do a better job in someplaces you get some trade offs.
It appears to too late for this project.
Hope this helps.