tszalai
Member
- Location
- Santa Rosa, CA
Here's the question first and the back story below: Has anyone ever experienced an electrical/motor problem due to undervoltage (of a 230-volt motor) with an RV connected to a 208 volt RV park?
We are working in California with the authority having jurisdiction, Housing and Community Development (HCD), over RV parks. HCD does not adopt NEC 551 and instead has its own state regulations (Mike Holt - please adjust CA's safety grade downward one point :dunce. HCD does not allow the pedestals to be connected at 208 volts because of the potential to have problems with 240-volt appliances. HCD - now made aware that NEC started allowing this in 2005 - is concerned that the NFPA got this wrong and is putting RV's at risk for failure/fire due to undervoltages.
Specifically the issue would be with line-to-line appliances which will most often be the air conditioning. The issue here would be the larger rigs that have a 50-amp line-to-line connection which are newer and should be built to the 208/230 requirement; how many older rigs are there that have 50-amp line-to-line connections that are only rated at 230 volt?
The standard in CA at least is for the pedestal to have single-pole 20A and 30A receptacles, so older rigs at 30A would be 120-volt; only the 50 amp units would be 208 or 240 volt.
As NEMA 230-volt rated motors are intended to be functional at +/- 10% of voltage, the low end at 207 volts is right on the threshold and it is likely that most RV's in a park would have less than 207 volts at the pedestal with voltage drop.
I have sent HCD the 2005 NEC Handbook explanations to 551.40 noting that manufacturered RV equipment needs to be 208/230-rated.
HCD is checking with the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association and I will be checking the related NFPA/ANSI standards.
(I'm not particularly trusting of HCD's state regulations as they currently require the EGC and the grounded conductor to be bonded together to a ground rod at every RV pedestal. I've told them this is an NEC 250 violation, which they do adopt - they're essentially creating parallel neutrals... Mike - minus one more point... :slaphead
This issue is of concern for some RV parks in CA which have been 208 volts since they opened 30+ years ago without known issues, where HCD won't allow them to continue to operate at 208 volts or stay at 208 volts if they upgrade. It's a utility issue as 240-volt services are generally not available above 600 amps, so a 480 volt service must be taken and transformers used for larger parks. It's also a cost issue as three-phase 208Y/120 feeders are more cost-effecting than single-phase 240/120 feeders, and three phase 240/120 is not a good idea for distribution in the parks with the 208V stinger.
This is one of those local issues that I would appreciate hearing others' experience and/or knowledge on the subject. I was hoping to bump this to the Mike Holt (guru) directly or indirectly to at least get an opinion if the NFPA is indeed out to lunch for allowing 208 volt parks...
Thanks in advance! - Terry Szalai, P.E. - Summit Engineering in Santa Rosa, CA
We are working in California with the authority having jurisdiction, Housing and Community Development (HCD), over RV parks. HCD does not adopt NEC 551 and instead has its own state regulations (Mike Holt - please adjust CA's safety grade downward one point :dunce. HCD does not allow the pedestals to be connected at 208 volts because of the potential to have problems with 240-volt appliances. HCD - now made aware that NEC started allowing this in 2005 - is concerned that the NFPA got this wrong and is putting RV's at risk for failure/fire due to undervoltages.
Specifically the issue would be with line-to-line appliances which will most often be the air conditioning. The issue here would be the larger rigs that have a 50-amp line-to-line connection which are newer and should be built to the 208/230 requirement; how many older rigs are there that have 50-amp line-to-line connections that are only rated at 230 volt?
The standard in CA at least is for the pedestal to have single-pole 20A and 30A receptacles, so older rigs at 30A would be 120-volt; only the 50 amp units would be 208 or 240 volt.
As NEMA 230-volt rated motors are intended to be functional at +/- 10% of voltage, the low end at 207 volts is right on the threshold and it is likely that most RV's in a park would have less than 207 volts at the pedestal with voltage drop.
I have sent HCD the 2005 NEC Handbook explanations to 551.40 noting that manufacturered RV equipment needs to be 208/230-rated.
HCD is checking with the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association and I will be checking the related NFPA/ANSI standards.
(I'm not particularly trusting of HCD's state regulations as they currently require the EGC and the grounded conductor to be bonded together to a ground rod at every RV pedestal. I've told them this is an NEC 250 violation, which they do adopt - they're essentially creating parallel neutrals... Mike - minus one more point... :slaphead
This issue is of concern for some RV parks in CA which have been 208 volts since they opened 30+ years ago without known issues, where HCD won't allow them to continue to operate at 208 volts or stay at 208 volts if they upgrade. It's a utility issue as 240-volt services are generally not available above 600 amps, so a 480 volt service must be taken and transformers used for larger parks. It's also a cost issue as three-phase 208Y/120 feeders are more cost-effecting than single-phase 240/120 feeders, and three phase 240/120 is not a good idea for distribution in the parks with the 208V stinger.
This is one of those local issues that I would appreciate hearing others' experience and/or knowledge on the subject. I was hoping to bump this to the Mike Holt (guru) directly or indirectly to at least get an opinion if the NFPA is indeed out to lunch for allowing 208 volt parks...
Thanks in advance! - Terry Szalai, P.E. - Summit Engineering in Santa Rosa, CA