M
mkoloj
Guest
IF
Then your prior suggestion is -probably the quickest and cheapest solution with the only change from me being a switch rather than a repeater if it is necessary. I would give it about a 99.9% that it will work.
HighWirey said:The young man just wants to have his 'puter working
Then your prior suggestion is -probably the quickest and cheapest solution with the only change from me being a switch rather than a repeater if it is necessary. I would give it about a 99.9% that it will work.
HighWirey said:Tryinghard,
If your son has the latitude to do this ? run the new network cable the 420+ feet, leaving a loop at some convenient location in the middle with sufficient in length to insert a repeater. If it works, it works. If not, cut in a repeater. No sense buying extra hardware.
I agree that the maximum length standard for most network cables is 100 meters. When I purchase network cable, my purchase order always specifies that a Certificate of Conformance assompany the shipment.
I always adhered to the 100 meter spec, but a rhetorical question here is: the cable is always put up in 1,000 foot spools/boxes ? ?how can the manufacturer certify that the cable met testing standards? if the put-up length is 1,000 feet? I know, they extrapolated the test results from past statistics, but it would seem that a reputable manufacturer would not risk their good reputations if they were not confident.
Have your son install the 420+ foot run. I?ll bet it works reliably.
Good luck,
Steve