That would take me back to days when you dipped connections in solderOk now, let's talk about using a delta breaker as a main.![]()
That would take me back to days when you dipped connections in solderOk now, let's talk about using a delta breaker as a main.![]()
Im VERY familiar with open delta applications and configurations.. just not with the high leg, precisely for the reasons you've stated. Typically we have the inverse problem: heavy three phase load and small single phase load. Of course, for every application there probably is its inverse.
Delta breakers were not used as mains, they were a method of connecting a three pole breaker to a single phase bus panel.Ok now, let's talk about using a delta breaker as a main.![]()
Code requires you to (can't remember the section offhand).
Delta breakers were not used as mains, they were a method of connecting a three pole breaker to a single phase bus panel.
The high leg is almost always "B" phase in terms of the phase rotation sequence. Older utility metering equipment needed to have the high leg on the "C" phase position so that their cash registers would work correctly. The utility just landed the "B" phase conductor in the "C" phase position at the metering equipment and we just restore it to its correct position at the service equipment.Of course but, since it is physically outside of A and B, how did our industry decide this was a good idea? I can imagine the fist fights at that code panel discussion.
Maybe they proposed it only to trade it for something crazy like ground rods.![]()
Where there was only one three phase load in the panel the delta breaker was the "main" for the high leg. The high leg from the utility was landed directly on the delta breaker. The other two phases were obtained from the panel bus....
Delta breakers were not used as mains, they were a method of connecting a three pole breaker to a single phase bus panel.
Don described it a little better then I did. The delta breaker plugged on to the two phases of a regular single phase panel. The incoming third phase supplied only one pole of the delta breaker. Part of reason they are no longer acceptable is mentioned in Don's post, turning off the main breaker but not the delta breaker could result in back feed voltage through the load connected to the delta breaker and back onto the panel bus as the third phase from the supply was never interrupted.The way I remember it being used was three phase coming into the panel it the breaker with the high leg passing through it and going on to the load.
But, maybe it could have been a MLO panel and the high leg going straight through to the equipment OCP that contained the delta breaker.
Would that be correct?
It seems to work better that way I guess.
Where there was only one three phase load in the panel the delta breaker was the "main" for the high leg. The high leg from the utility was landed directly on the delta breaker. The other two phases were obtained from the panel bus.
If you just turned on the panel main, you still had the high leg energized at the 3 phase equipment, unless you also turned off the delta breaker. Of course turning off the delta breaker did kill all of the conductors to the 3 phase equipment.
Not as much as you might think.Not odd in the connection sense, but odd in that youre going to have to de-rate the crap out of that connection.
The voltage regulation is unbalanced and that can be a concern if the bank is heavily loaded, even for balanced loads.In my nerd glasses world im cringing at the voltage regulation on a system like that.
I wouldn't say that. The voltages are unbalanced and can cause issues if the bank is heavily loaded and serving three-phase motors that are near full load.The phase to phase 240 is rock solid in this setup
The inverse problem will still have a high leg. Amazing that you have not run across a center-tap delta bank before. I guess it just depends on local practice but I thought they were about as common as dirt.Im VERY familiar with open delta applications and configurations.. just not with the high leg, precisely for the reasons you've stated. Typically we have the inverse problem: heavy three phase load and small single phase load. Of course, for every application there probably is its inverse.
The inverse problem will still have a high leg. Amazing that you have not run across a center-tap delta bank before. I guess it just depends on local practice but I thought they were about as common as dirt.
Don't forget the de-rating that may be necessary to help compensate for poor voltage regulation.Sorry, been out of the office for the past few days. As far as the derate goes, youre at 57% (line current limited to phase current to prevent overheating) of the single phase KVA from the open delta alone. Then you have to consider the reduction in equivalent KVA when looking at the split phase.
You would only double the transformer output current if you paralleled both half windingsWhen looking at I^2R = W, even cutting the resistance in half is bad when you are doubling the current via halving the voltage.
It may very well be the same size for small banks. For others you might even have something on the order of a 37.5 or 50 kVA combined with a 15 kVA.I wonder how much larger that center tapped transformer is?!