Neutrals in parallel

Tulsa Electrician

Senior Member
Location
Tulsa
Occupation
Electrician
Please confirm.
Your question is a #3 and #6 in parallel for a service netural. Also please include the ungrounded conductor size and service size in amps. For the hypothetical question.
 

Eddie702

Licensed Electrician
Location
Western Massachusetts
Occupation
Electrician
I realize all the wire like THHN/THWN/MTW is dual rated or triple rated but it has not always been that way.

I just wish when people say THHN and they are underground or outdoors it leads me to believe they don' know what the W means.

Also, if I am not mistaken THHN dry is 90C and THWN wet location is 75C so it makes a difference on de rating as well
 

retirede

Senior Member
Location
Illinois
Back to the original scenario, I agree with post 13. This is likely a 100A feeder and the #3 is a neutral, the #6 is the EGC. If they are truly in parallel, there is an improperly bonded N-G in the downstream panel.
 

domnic

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
Can someone please give me a example of parallel neutrals causing a problem or any type of danger ????????????????????????????????????????????????????
what i want to know is what is the problem with using two neutral wires of different sizes for a 100 amp service #6 and #3 the neutrals would be in parallel . what electrical problem could this cause ( hypothetical Queston )
 

jim dungar

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Wisconsin
Occupation
PE (Retired) - Power Systems
what i want to know is what is the problem with using two neutral wires of different sizes for a 100 amp service #6 and #3 the neutrals would be in parallel . what electrical problem could this cause ( hypothetical Queston )
This is too much of an open question.

Are you concerned about an intentional parallel installation or an inadvertent one?
Are you worried about inductive heating or EMF if the paralleled conductors are not following the same path?
Do you want to know how the currents are shared and any possible impact on their load carrying capacity?
 

domnic

Senior Member
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
This is too much of an open question.

Are you concerned about an intentional parallel installation or an inadvertent one?
Are you worried about inductive heating or EMF if the paralleled conductors are not following the same path?
Do you want to know how the currents are shared and any possible impact on their load carrying capacity?
ALL i want to know is what problem it could cause. if any !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

LarryFine

Master Electrician Electric Contractor Richmond VA
Location
Henrico County, VA
Occupation
Electrical Contractor
what i want to know is what is the problem with using two neutral wires of different sizes for a 100 amp service #6 and #3 the neutrals would be in parallel . what electrical problem could this cause ( hypothetical Queston )
Overheating of the smaller conductor.
 

jim dungar

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Wisconsin
Occupation
PE (Retired) - Power Systems
ALL i want to know is what problem it could cause. if any !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My question was a list of possible concerns.
You need to tell us more of the hypothetical conditions. Are the conductors run in the same magnetic conduit and with their respective ungrounded conductors? Are the conductors in an NM cable with different routing and lengths?
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
Overheating of the smaller conductor.
For normal conditions (no faults) and equal lengths, it's more likely the larger conductor will overheat. And of course that depends on how you have protected the unequal parallel conductors.

E.g. #3 AWG (100A 75C ampacity for Cu) has twice the area of #6 (65A 75C ampacity for Cu), and hence twice the conductance, half the resistance. If you paralleled them in equal lengths, the current would divide 2:1. So if you tried to protect them at the sum of their ampacities, 165A, then you'd get 110A on the #3 and 55A on the #6. The #3 is seeing in excess of its ampacity, while the #6 is still below its ampacity.

If you protect the pair at a lower value, say 100A, or even just protect the #3 at 100A, with no OCPD on the #6 (other than the fact that it will always see only half the current on the #3), then you can't overload either conductor without the OCPD seeing more current than it is rated for. Again, that's for equal length and no faults.

So I think the technical reasons to avoid such paralleling have to do with behavior in faults .

Cheers, Wayne
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
I realize all the wire like THHN/THWN/MTW is dual rated or triple rated but it has not always been that way.

I just wish when people say THHN and they are underground or outdoors it leads me to believe they don' know what the W means.

Also, if I am not mistaken THHN dry is 90C and THWN wet location is 75C so it makes a difference on de rating as well
Most if not all of it today also has THWN-2 designation which can be used at 90C for wet locations.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
ALL i want to know is what problem it could cause. if any !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Most instances probably little to none. The neutral only carries imbalanced current of the ungrounded conductors, your typical 100 amp dwelling service may not ever see over 30 or 40 amps on the neutral. If you actually had 100 amps of neutral load it would divide between the two paths, but since they are different size and different resistance it won't divide equally. I seriously doubt the #6 draws enough to overload it though. Would have to loose the #3 altogether for the #6 to carry all the current.
 
Location
NE (9.06 miles @5.9 Degrees from Winged Horses)
Occupation
EC - retired
For normal conditions (no faults) and equal lengths, it's more likely the larger conductor will overheat. And of course that depends on how you have protected the unequal parallel conductors.

E.g. #3 AWG (100A 75C ampacity for Cu) has twice the area of #6 (65A 75C ampacity for Cu), and hence twice the conductance, half the resistance. If you paralleled them in equal lengths, the current would divide 2:1. So if you tried to protect them at the sum of their ampacities, 165A, then you'd get 110A on the #3 and 55A on the #6. The #3 is seeing in excess of its ampacity, while the #6 is still below its ampacity.

If you protect the pair at a lower value, say 100A, or even just protect the #3 at 100A, with no OCPD on the #6 (other than the fact that it will always see only half the current on the #3), then you can't overload either conductor without the OCPD seeing more current than it is rated for. Again, that's for equal length and no faults.

So I think the technical reasons to avoid such paralleling have to do with behavior in faults .

Cheers, Wayne
These are theoretically paralleled neutral conductors so the chance of them seeing any thing over their ampacity would be only during fault condition.
 
Top