- Location
- Chapel Hill, NC
- Occupation
- Retired Electrical Contractor
It took almost 20 posts before you actually asked the question we can answer. lol.YOU are side stepping the Queston !!
It took almost 20 posts before you actually asked the question we can answer. lol.YOU are side stepping the Queston !!
Refer to post 13.Parallel neutrals at the service two different sizes what harm or danger could it cause ?
I don't think I've ever seen it.Where does one buy THHN that is also not rated THWN?
EMF issues because of parallel neutral , what problem could it cause ?Not sure but I think he is wondering about ground (neutral) loops, EMF issues.
Supposedly health issues but you would have to be between the conductors. Maybe in electronics.EMF issues because of parallel neutral , what problem could it cause ?
what i want to know is what is the problem with using two neutral wires of different sizes for a 100 amp service #6 and #3 the neutrals would be in parallel . what electrical problem could this cause ( hypothetical Queston )Can someone please give me a example of parallel neutrals causing a problem or any type of danger ????????????????????????????????????????????????????
This is too much of an open question.what i want to know is what is the problem with using two neutral wires of different sizes for a 100 amp service #6 and #3 the neutrals would be in parallel . what electrical problem could this cause ( hypothetical Queston )
ALL i want to know is what problem it could cause. if any !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!This is too much of an open question.
Are you concerned about an intentional parallel installation or an inadvertent one?
Are you worried about inductive heating or EMF if the paralleled conductors are not following the same path?
Do you want to know how the currents are shared and any possible impact on their load carrying capacity?
Overheating of the smaller conductor.what i want to know is what is the problem with using two neutral wires of different sizes for a 100 amp service #6 and #3 the neutrals would be in parallel . what electrical problem could this cause ( hypothetical Queston )
We've told you what it could do. It does not mean it will!ALL i want to know is what problem it could cause. if any !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My question was a list of possible concerns.ALL i want to know is what problem it could cause. if any !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
For normal conditions (no faults) and equal lengths, it's more likely the larger conductor will overheat. And of course that depends on how you have protected the unequal parallel conductors.Overheating of the smaller conductor.
Most if not all of it today also has THWN-2 designation which can be used at 90C for wet locations.I realize all the wire like THHN/THWN/MTW is dual rated or triple rated but it has not always been that way.
I just wish when people say THHN and they are underground or outdoors it leads me to believe they don' know what the W means.
Also, if I am not mistaken THHN dry is 90C and THWN wet location is 75C so it makes a difference on de rating as well
Most instances probably little to none. The neutral only carries imbalanced current of the ungrounded conductors, your typical 100 amp dwelling service may not ever see over 30 or 40 amps on the neutral. If you actually had 100 amps of neutral load it would divide between the two paths, but since they are different size and different resistance it won't divide equally. I seriously doubt the #6 draws enough to overload it though. Would have to loose the #3 altogether for the #6 to carry all the current.ALL i want to know is what problem it could cause. if any !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
These are theoretically paralleled neutral conductors so the chance of them seeing any thing over their ampacity would be only during fault condition.For normal conditions (no faults) and equal lengths, it's more likely the larger conductor will overheat. And of course that depends on how you have protected the unequal parallel conductors.
E.g. #3 AWG (100A 75C ampacity for Cu) has twice the area of #6 (65A 75C ampacity for Cu), and hence twice the conductance, half the resistance. If you paralleled them in equal lengths, the current would divide 2:1. So if you tried to protect them at the sum of their ampacities, 165A, then you'd get 110A on the #3 and 55A on the #6. The #3 is seeing in excess of its ampacity, while the #6 is still below its ampacity.
If you protect the pair at a lower value, say 100A, or even just protect the #3 at 100A, with no OCPD on the #6 (other than the fact that it will always see only half the current on the #3), then you can't overload either conductor without the OCPD seeing more current than it is rated for. Again, that's for equal length and no faults.
So I think the technical reasons to avoid such paralleling have to do with behavior in faults .
Cheers, Wayne