Craigv
Senior Member
- Location
- Boyertown, PA, USA
Yes, I agree with all of the above.
I don't believe I have made that claim. All I ever intended to say was that if a load center's trim has no provision for attaching a door, its enclosure is not a cabinet, and so Article 312 does not apply. I don't think it matters if there is another trim available for the enclosure that would accept a door; if the installed trim has no provision for accepting a door, it's not a cabinet.
Edit: I see that up until post #52, we both were using the phrase "panelboard without a door" which was somewhat ambiguous. In post #52, I clarified that per the definition, what matters is the provision for having a door, not whether the door is actually there.
Cheers, Wayne
Okay, so are you implying that a panelboard with a no-door trim installed does not have to have NM cables individually secured to the enclosure because that loadcenter isn't a cabinet? That seems beyond unlikely as an NEC intent, and the factor of a door or no door has absolutely no bearing on the use of nonmetallic cable. There's no logic supporting this whatsoever, and it's an enormous stretch of interpretation.