As long as 110.26 is followed, there is no problem.
Roger
Oh the humanity!
As long as 110.26 is followed there is no problem. (Hmmmm, I have this strange feeling of Deja Vu) :wink:How about if there is an indoor fountain front of it?
I might think of using a NEMA 3R panel and some ambient corrections, but it wouldn't change anything as far as location to a mop sink is concerned.How about if it is inside of a hothouse for tropical plants with 100% humidity and 85F* or higher maintained?
As long as 110.26 is followed there is no problem. (Hmmmm, I have this strange feeling of Deja Vu) :wink:
I might think of using a NEMA 3R panel and some ambient corrections, but it wouldn't change anything as far as location to a mop sink is concerned.
Roger
OK, but WHERE do you find support for this in the Code?
The better question would be, "WHERE do you find a prohibition in the Code?"
Roger
This example demonstrates how the Code allows installations which present dangers as obviously as a dot on the guru's forehead,
So write a proposal for a change or addition, that is how the code is developed.
Aaaah, finally we're getting somewhere.
This example demonstrates how the Code allows installations which present dangers as obviously as a dot on the guru's forehead, ...
Bob, thanks for the invite, I am not going to be a party of a process that I consider fundamentally faulty.
Oh, then by all means just continue to whine. :roll:
See Article 100 I - Location, Damp; Location, Wet
If it is obvious this panel is going to be saturated by the mop sink then apply 312.2
Moderator?! Hahahahahaha........
It's funny, every time I call you on something I get PMs telling me thanks.![]()
Bob, thanks for the invite, I am not going to be a party of a process that I consider fundamentally faulty.
This remindes me of people who constantly complain about politicians yet won't vote because they don't like the system.
Then quit 'yer whinin'! :grin:![]()