That's a tough one. That's a character issue.Even then would you derate....think about that for a moment.
ARTICLE 334 Nonmetallic-Sheathed Cable: Types NM, NMC, and NMS
334.80 Ampacity.
The ampacity of Types NM, NMC, and NMS cable shall be determined in accordance with 310.15. The ampacity shall be in accordance with the 60?C (140?F) conductor temperature rating. The 90?C (194?F) rating shall be permitted to be used for ampacity derating purposes, provided the final derated ampacity does not exceed that for a 60?C (140?F) rated conductor. The ampacity of Types NM, NMC, and NMS cable installed in cable tray shall be determined in accordance with 392.11.
Your right, the 'B' does mean something, it means it is NM cable modified with 90 C conductors.Originally posted by physis:
Rush Limbaugh says "words mean stuff", I say "letters mean stuff".![]()
Read the fine print note.334.112 Insulation.
The insulated power conductors shall be one of the types listed in Table 310.13 that is suitable for branch circuit wiring or one that is identified for use in these cables. Conductor insulation shall be rated at 90?C (194?F).
FPN:Types NM, NMC, and NMS cable identified by the markings NM-B, NMC-B, and NMS-B meet this requirement.
Well no, as you do not see the -B in the code section only in the FPN.Originally posted by physis:
Does that say NM must be -B?
Sure, now we are right back to 334.80 which I posted a little while ago.Originally posted by physis:
Alright wise guy, does it say NM must be 90? C?
And then say we must treaet it as 60? C?
![]()