volt101
Senior Member
- Location
- New Hampshire
Just wait for the app to come out...Oh, btw, only for iPhones....Bummer Crackberry......
Just wait for the app to come out...Oh, btw, only for iPhones....Bummer Crackberry......
Does anyone know why they've adopted this policy? CD's costs cents to burn and they charge an arm and a leg for them. Seems like if money were an issue they would abandon printing code books instead. They charge less for the books and they're much more costly to produce.
Right now there is a special limited time offer for a free PDF copy of the 2011 NEC included in the back cover of the softbound edition of the 2011 NEC. I purchased my NEC at the local supply house for $59.00 and downloaded the PDF to my work computer.
Chris
$59.00-- It cost me $73.00 (I think)It is amazing how the cost difference varies.
I did and was told that the company that developed and supported the software is no longer around, FWIW.:roll:
$59.00-- It cost me $73.00 (I think)It is amazing how the cost difference varies.
Right now there is a special limited time offer for a free PDF copy of the 2011 NEC included in the back cover of the softbound edition of the 2011 NEC. I purchased my NEC at the local supply house for $59.00 and downloaded the PDF to my work computer.
Chris
..............We had it pointed out to us in the past in CEU classes offered by this organization that if you purchased one of these early copies that there can be errors in them - usually typographical type errors, that if you look in a later copy it will have been corrected.
Look on the inside of the front cover, at the bottom. There's two sets of numbers. The first set will be something like 15 14 13 12 11 10 followed by 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1.
My understanding is, the lowest number in the first set is for the year of the printing, the highest number in the second set for the month. So if your '11 was printed in August of 2010, you should see 15 14 13 12 11 10 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1. November of this year? 15 14 13 12 11 10 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1. Copies printed in March of 2013 will have 15 14 13 3 2 1.
Maybe the '11 will have an errata published, too. Or else the NFPA doesn't make mistakes any more.
Why Don't They just print a born on date in the code like.20100923-23:47EST
:grin:
There will be a list of errata issued by NFPA for the editions that are published.
Chris
I never saw one for the '08, though.
True, maybe they have made the perfect NEC.
Chris
So, no more changes!![]()