Don't tell anyone I told you this....480 Live said:I was wondering about non contact voltage tester. Anyone have good or bad experiences? Looking for something to use when you come across the touch safe covers, most test holes don’t allow a conventional tester to reach a contact point.
mdshunk said:Don't tell anyone I told you this....
I take my long skinny straight screwdriver, and poke it in to touch the terminal, then put the volt ticker up to the screwdriver shaft. I'm sure that's not the recommended procedure. :wink:
Pierre C Belarge said:A volt tick is good for testing for the presence of voltage, but not as reliable for testing of no voltage.
What I mean by that is this:
When using a volt tic (non contact voltage tester) and it shows the presence of voltage, then you can trust that most likely there is voltage present. When using the volt tic and it does not show the presence of voltage, I would then take out my voltage tester, whether it is a wiggy or DMM and properly test to make sure there is a lack of voltage.
weressl said:Well, the old rule was - and still is - that one test their meter, instrument gizmo, etc. on a LIVE circuit before trying to identify the non-energized circuit.
don_resqcapt19 said:Mark,
There are cases where your noncontact tester will give a false negative. The most common is a cable with a paper filler like found in NM. If the paper is wet these type of testers will often show no voltage where there is real voltage. This effect only occurs very close to the wet paper, but it is something to watch out for.
Don
busman said:An interesting side note: I have noticed that the non-contact testers will light up at great distances (6 inches or more) on circuits running fluorescent lights. I think it must be related to the harmonics?