mivey
Senior Member
dv/di. Winnie just described a device that has a linear relationship between dv and di instead of V and I (at least in the region from 7.5 to 8.5 volts).LarryFine said:That I don't understand. Incremental resistance?
dv/di. Winnie just described a device that has a linear relationship between dv and di instead of V and I (at least in the region from 7.5 to 8.5 volts).LarryFine said:That I don't understand. Incremental resistance?
mivey said:dv/di. Winnie just described a device that has a linear relationship between dv and di instead of V and I (at least in the region from 7.5 to 8.5 volts).
rattus said:Larry, it is misleading to say the impedance of the cap changes. the reactance of the cap is always 1/(2*pi*f*C) regardless of the charge on the cap.
LarryFine said:That's simple enough. The VD of the resistor drops as the cap charges and approaches steady-state voltage. The circuit is behaving as if the capacitor's impedance rises as it approaches the supply voltage.
When the cap is at full voltage, it behaves as if it is an open in the circuit, or of infinite impedance.
That I understand. What I was saying, and what ELA caught (Thanx!), is that, since the resistor's impedance can be considered constant, and the only other element in the loop is the cap, the latter certainly looks like its impedance is increasing as it approaches the source voltage.gar said:As charge flows thru the resistor this increases the voltage on the capacitor, but now the current thru the resistor is (Vbat - Vcap)/R. Therefore the higher the voltage on the capacitor the less charging current and in turn the capacitor voltage changes more slowly.
ELA said:Rattus and others posturing here: Maybe we should just start a poll on who is the smartest participant here?
I thought Larry explained very well that the circuit behaves as if!
It is often useful to "think of" circuit behavior in simpler terms to help our understanding of what is going on. No need to jump on someone for that.
Thinking in strict theory will get you into trouble if you miss a decimal point on your calculator.
We've always been taught that it's 90 degrees.gar said:What is the maximum possible phase shift of an RC circuit?
You mean it's not the reduction of current that causes the voltage across the resistor to decrease??? :-?rattus said:It is not a change of impedance, it is a reduction of voltage across the series resistor that causes the current to decrease.
LarryFine said:You mean it's not the reduction of current that causes the voltage across the resistor to decrease??? :-?
rattus said:I strongly disagree, you only increase misunderstanding by misusing terms which are precisely defined.
rattus said:Impedance is not defined in time-domain problems such as a capacitor charging from a step function voltage. Impedance is only defined for steady state solutions with RMS values.
gar has already said this, but I had to say it again.
ELA said:Misusing the term "As If" ? What part of that do you not understand?
I think you should read a little more closely. Wouldn't it have been easier to have recognized your error in reading than to continue to posture?
Or is it that if we do not think like just Rattus does that you will continue to beat it to death until we do:roll:
yes that is very obviousrattus said:I do not understand why one would use such an analogy instead of explaining what really happens. .
rattus said:It is not a matter of my opinion; it is simply a matter of TRVTH
ELA said:The TRVTH according to Rattus :grin:
By the way:
Just curious as to the definition of "Simultaneous" according to Rattus?
10 Femtoseconds , 90 Nanoseconds, 12 Microseconds ????
rattus said:I would say a few milliseconds delay is simultaneous in the world of 60HZ power.
I agree that the voltage causes the current to flow, but it's the resultant current that causes the voltage drop to occur.rattus said:I prefer to think the voltage causes the current to flow, but however you look at it, it is not a change in impedance that reduces the current.
Would you prefer mayonaise or mustard??rattus said:If anyone can prove me wrong, I will eat a noisy black bird with no salt and pepper. Turkeys are included!
I would say a few milliseconds delay is simultaneous in the world of 60HZ power.
I would say rattus is going to go hungry because how would you prove him wrong? It is like the Monty Python question "what is your favorite color?"quogueelectric said:Would you prefer mayonaise or mustard??
The definition according to rattus is whatever he wants it to be. Now had the question been asked differently, there may be a meal in the making. For example:ELA said:Just curious as to the definition of "Simultaneous" according to Rattus?
10 Femtoseconds , 90 Nanoseconds, 12 Microseconds ????