Bruno said:Thanks Celtic for the quick reply. The sight is what I was looking for, thanks again.
weressl said:Yes, indeed thanks for the link.
One thing interesting to note.
I have reviewed the State incident investigations one-by-one in the 92-05 period and out of the over 100 deaths listed there were 2, I repeat TWO that can be attributed to arc flash. All the others were related to electrocution.
So please somebody remind my; WHY do we fall all over ourselves to protect against arc-flash? Does it smell like somebody has a political agenda?
gndrod said:Great post Laszlo, I was wondering about the same thing. Maybe Arc Fault Protection device manufacturers have more to add to the 2008 210.12 change in 2011?
how large is the problem?
According to CapSchell, Inc., a Chicagobased
research and consulting firm that
specializes in workplace injury prevention,
there are five to 10 arc flash explosions
every day in the United States.
The final cost to employers and their
insurers for a single, serious injury can
approach $10 million (CapSchell).
2,000 workers are admitted annually
to burn centers for extended injury treatments
caused by arc flash, according to
the U.S. Department of Labor.
A recent study from the
National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health (NIOSH)
determined that during the period
from 1992 through 2001, there
were 44,363 electricity-related injuries
involving days away from work.
The number of non-fatal electrical shock
injuries was 27,262, while 17,101 injuries
were caused by electric arc-flash burns.
M. D. said:What ,.. 17,000 injuries aren't enough?? More than half the total non fatal caused by arc-flash. So we have to die to get noticed ??? is that it??
Good Grief....!
gndrod said:Great post Laszlo, I was wondering about the same thing. Maybe Arc Fault Protection device manufacturers have more to add to the 2008 210.12 change in 2011?