I concede this weakness in my proof, and will adjust it accordingly. See below.Originally posted by steve66: I have to disagree with your proof. . . . The receptacle may be there for other reasons. It may be there per 210.70(A)(1), in which case it would not be on a small appliance circuit
I do disagree. Specifically, I submit that if you install a receptacle in the dining room, and if it is not for a switched light (with acknowledgements to Steve66), then it becomes an SA circuit, and it inherits the restrictions associated with SA circuits.Originally posted by Local:However just because an outlet is in a location does not mean it all the sudden becomes something it is not. Do you disagree with that Charlie B?
I think you have hit the reason square in the nose, it is simply a hold over.Just out of curiosity, does anyone know why the dining recep's are required to be on SA circ's. Is it a hold over from days gone by when loads were different in the dining room?
I feel there is one question we have failed to ask or looked into about this post. How old is this house and IS THIS dinning room wired in accordance with the 2002 NEC SA requirement?Originally posted by livewirek1:
can a dining room receptacle circuit be used to supply a weatherproof receptacle in a single family dwelling?
RodgerOriginally posted by roger:
What breaks the required SA circuits from being on every wall?![]()
Roger