ty
Senior Member
- Location
- 3rd Rock from the Sun
I have no problem with using quad.. for this application.
But for those that do, use a messenger and UF.
But for those that do, use a messenger and UF.
I have no problem with using quad.. for this application..
Neither do I, I am just saying I have not seen listed quad cable.
service wire company makes it in copper w/ XHHW-2 insulation
http://www.servicewire.com/downloads/service_drop.pdf
I followed your link. For each size (2/0, 3/0 etc) they assigned a "code name" to each one.
Where did that come from, is that a POCO thing?
I followed your link. For each size (2/0, 3/0 etc) they assigned a "code name" to each one.
Where did that come from, is that a POCO thing?
I don't see anything in 396 that requires the product to be a listed product.Sure if it is listed.
I don't see anything in 396 that requires the product to be a listed product.
I don't see anything in 396 that requires the product to be a listed product.
I think there is a big difference here. The discussions about DLO hinge on requirements that conductors used within Chapter 3 wiring methods be conductors that are listed in Table 310.13. There is no such requirement for the conductors in a factory assembled messenger cable. Look at Table 396.10(A) and notice the absence of an article reference for a "factory assembled" cable. With It requires that the cable be "identified", and while a listing is one method by which a product can be "identified" for a specific use, it does actually require a listing. I would say that the quadplex or triplex factory cable assemblies are "recognizable as suitable for the specific purpose, function, use, environment, application, and so forth" based on the extensive successful use of these products by the utilities.A bad choice of words on my part.
Listed, as in listed in Table 310.13.
There may well be quadplex with the correct markings but I have not seen it in this area.
No different than all the discussions about DLO cable that is not dual listed.
Messenger supported conductors are "specifically provided for elsewhere in this Code" and therefore are not subject to the rules in Article 310. 310.1Where would you use ACSR? Outside?
If so, would it not stand to reason that it would be exposed to sunlight and rain? So would not 310.(8)(C) and (D) apply?
Just stirring the pot a bit.