Yup. A standard door is 6'8" so if the the scale is correct he's good to go.You would still need the 6-1/2' "headroom" required in 110.26(A)(3) would you not ?
That just means that no other equipment can be in that space 6' above the panelboard.... but no way would I have met the 6'-0" above rule.
I wouldn't call a stairwell platform "equipment", it is a "structure"."No piping, ducts, leak protection apparatus, or other equipment foreign to the electrical installation shall be located in this zone."
Looks like a j box to me.
nope, there were circuit breakers in there.Looks like a j box to me.
IMO the foreign systems provision would not apply to a stairwell which is part of the structure.
And as far as "dedicated space" above the equipment, the stairs is the structural ceiling,if they are over the equipment.Yup. A standard door is 6'8" so if the the scale is correct he's good to go.![]()
Certainly can't add a new panel to that location, nor will most AHJ's allow you to upgrade that one and leave it in that same position.
Unless that's just a remnant and is an empty box...Certainly can't add a new panel to that location, nor will most AHJ's allow you to upgrade that one and leave it in that same position.
I don't know when NEC started prohibiting such install over the stairs, so is possible it can remain there if it was compliant when installed.
The handrail is still a problem though.
- NEC 2020 - 300.25,
- NFPA 101 2015- 7.1.3.2.1(10)
This is a staircase, not an "exit enclosure separated from the building".300.25. Exit Enclosures (Stair Towers). Where an exit enclosure is required to be separated from the building,...
This doesn't say "exit enclosure", but is the UNDERSIDE of the staircase part of the exit path? Is this an exit at all? Not enough info on this aspect.IBC 2018 - 1023.1
It is unclear what the purpose of the staircase is. If this set of stairs is intended for egress from the floor above then the staircase is probably located in a stairwell that is probably a rated assembly that encloses the "exit" of the floors above (hence "exit enclosure"). Take this explanation with a grain of salt as I am not an architect, but that is how I understand it to be. The "separated from the building" portion refers to the required fire separation of egress stairwells. Additional info is needed from the OP to determine if this is applicable. I believe 300.25 was added to align with NFPA 101, but NFPA 101 is as clear as mud.This is a staircase, not an "exit enclosure separated from the building".
The ICC suite of building codes uses different verbiage to describe things compared to NFPA. The IBC uses "interior exit stairways". I do agree that there isn't enough information to state anything conclusive.This doesn't say "exit enclosure", but is the UNDERSIDE of the staircase part of the exit path? Is this an exit at all? Not enough info on this aspect.
Makes sense if this is the Egress stairs and it maybe even the only Exit in case of emergency.The ICC suite of building codes uses different verbiage to describe things compared to NFPA. The IBC uses "interior exit stairways". I do agree that there isn't enough information to state anything conclusive.