Suppose the GEC required is a 2/0 AWG. If you run 3 sets of #4AWG and irreversible bond both ends of the cables, would that be a code violation?
If you have 3 raceways, a full size GEC is required in each raceway.
Why would a GEC be required in any of the raceways?
PVC, spec.
Why would a GEC be required in any of the raceways?
Some AHJs do not allow conduit to be used as a GEC.
If they haven't made a formal amendment and they are inspecting for NEC compliance they have no choice in the matter.Some AHJs do not allow conduit to be used as a EGC's
Suppose the GEC required is a 2/0 AWG. If you run 3 sets of #4AWG and irreversible bond both ends of the cables, would that be a code violation?
If they haven't made a formal amendment and they are inspecting for NEC compliance they have no choice in the matter.
Roger
https://www.phoenix.gov/pddsite/Documents/2012_amend_index.pdf
Page 270
I had them enforce with RGC too...
The answer is yes it's a violation. You need to size the GEC according to 250.66 which has no provisions for paralleling.
The relevant question is whether the paralleling prohibitions exclude GEC's.I thought I read once in the forum that the NEC is a permissive Code meaning that if it doesn't forbid it then it is allowed, or was it the opposite that I read?
IMO, it would be a violation however, the code does not address this for grounding electrode conductor's. I would use 310.10(H) as a premise that doesn't allow parallel for smaller than 1/0. Again the code does not mention grounding electrode conductor's.
One can say that since the code doesn't mention it in 310.10(H) then it is not permitted to be paralleled.
The relevant question is whether the paralleling prohibitions exclude GEC's.
The relevant question is whether the paralleling prohibitions exclude GEC's.