weressl
Esteemed Member
Since you do not seem to want to explain your statements then I'll have a look for myself:
These items are not addressed in your paper but are addressed in sources like the paper I referenced discussing things like motor starts and other short-time loads and generator protection schemes.
And we have:
And we have:
And we have:
I should also add load-shedding in addition to load banks and parallel generating units.
If you make statements but can't or won't explain then we have communis interruptus. It's really up to you but if you don't want to communicate then what is your function?
Sorry if you don't see the contradiction.
Incidentally I haven't seen you posting any external links to substantiate your quantitive statements, such as the 300% inrush, etc. Could have missed it though.
What I posted was a defineite interpretation of one manufacturer compilation of various ISO rules for genset rating determination. Manufacturers play around with the different ratings, but ALL generators are mechanically capable of delivering ANY of those ratings at the appropriaate penalty. The electronic governors and regulators will impose restrictions not as much to protect the generators and the engine from destruction, but rather to keep it within the manufacturers warranty limits.
Last edited: