That's a very good point. But the new 100A motor was there when the transformers were replaced and upgraded following the lightning strike. PoCo replaced both transformers, and did so with larger units. The reason for the upsized transformers was specifically to help resolve our pump power issues. If we have three primary phases at the pole, I don't understand why they didn't switch us over to a 3-transformer "true' 3-phase system at that point, unless it's because they didn't recognize the issues that were raised by Augie (for those who haven't read every post in this thread, Augie described a similar problem with 3-phase power to submersible pumps that was solved by supplying them with "true" 3-phase power).They saved cost of one transformer, especially if load is not there to warrant the third transformer. You have added a 100 amp motor that was not there when transformer bank was originally constructed, it may be worth having it now.
What is considered "significant". Our current 120V line-to-neutral loads are roughly 10A, the majority of which are from two 120V exterior lighting branch circuits that are on two separate phases. We will soon be adding an additional 1,000VA lighting load, but that will be 240V so it shouldn't affect our line-to-neutral loading.The only time they install one large transformer and one or two smaller ones is when there is significant line to neutral loads because it is that particular transformer that will carry those loads. If majority of load is line to line this is not an issue.
So is 10A of 120V line-to-neutral current (rougly split across the two phases) considered significant compared to our smallest 3-phase pump load of 60A (old pump running alone)?