DOH! Good pointOriginally posted by electricmanscott:
The requirement as written applies only to SE cable.
NO.Does it state in the code that the point of attachment for an over head service must be located below the the weather head rather than above?
230.26 Point of Attachment.
The point of attachment of the service-drop conductors to a building or other structure shall provide the minimum clearances as specified in 230.24. In no case shall this point of attachment be less than 3.0 m (10 ft) above finished grade.
230.27 Means of Attachment.
Multiconductor cables used for service drops shall be attached to buildings or other structures by fittings identified for use with service conductors. Open conductors shall be attached to fittings identified for use with service conductors or to noncombustible, nonabsorbent insulators securely attached to the building or other structure.
I just got dinged on this, this past summer at our local Little League. I had to climb back up the pole and extend my conduit another 6 inches to make it to the point of attachment. Dang POCO put their point of attachment within three inches of the top of the pole.Originally posted by physis:
230.54(C) Service Heads Above Service-Drop Attatchment. Service heads and goosenecks in service-entrance cables shall be located above the point of attatchment of the service drop conductors to the building or other structure.
I think it is meant to be read as if: (goosenecks in service-entrance cables) were considered as a weather head.
Yes, 230.54(C)Does it state in the code that the point of attachment for an over head service must be located below the the weather head rather than above?
I am back.Originally posted by electricmanscott:
The requirement as written applies only to SE cable.
It applies to all service conductors.230.54(C) Service Heads Above Service-Drop Attachment. Service heads and goosenecks in service-entrance cables shall be located above the point of attachment of the service-drop conductors to the building or other structure.