Power Strips - Code Violation

[mikeames]

That is not an NEC violation, because the NEC does not tell the user how to use the electrical distribution system. There is some room for debate on that point, and such debates have taken place here. But for the specific example you mention, using a plug strip at a computer work station, I would assert that the NEC is silent.

I agree with you charlie and another point would be no cord an plug above a drop ceiling. We can put a duplex in above a ceiling but we can plug much into it. That kind of restricts what we can connect to the system. Again I agree but...

 

[zbang]

I might even go a step further - would having to remove two screws to take off a power strip mean its "permanently mounted"??

Don't we call an outlet box 'permanently mounted" if it's screwed to the wall? I'm just sayin', since somewhere out there, someone is going to say that the power strip screwed to the wall is not allowed. Me? I think it's just fine. I mean, the device passed UL with those mounting holes and the mfg's instructions say to use them. Sometimes they even provide the screws.

 

[inspector 102]

The International Fire Code states that extention cords shall not be used in lieu of permanent wiring. Many fire inspectors were calling this power strips extension cord. The IFC now calls these relocatable power taps and as long as it is a single power tap plugged directly into a permanently installed receptacle, I believe it is approved. You can not daisy chain power taps so the limit is one. The IFC states that the power tap shall comply with UL 1363 and may not extend through walls, ceilings, floors, under doors or floor coverings, or be subject to environmental or physical damage.