Preferred Splice

Status
Not open for further replies.

Alwayslearningelec

Senior Member
Location
NJ
Occupation
Estimator
Simply splice together 2/0 THHN in a junction box what's your preferred splice material/method to use....barring any spec calling for particulars. Split bolt, Ilsco tap block etc.
 
Ilsco/polaris type splice. On something like a riser with multiple splices crimp connectors with cold shrinks.
 
Crimp is same as barrel splice?
Yes there are many names for the same thing with different variations depending on how the wire is connected. What I'm referring to is one of these which is compressed by a tool and insulated with a cold shrink.

CT.jpg
 
Same here
Yes there are many names for the same thing with different variations depending on how the wire is connected. What I'm referring to is one of these which is compressed by a tool and insulated with a cold shrink.

CT.jpg
Same here as far as the connection device, by my preference is for heavy wall, glue filled, heat shrink....unless I am outside in cold temperatures, then I use cold shrink.
 
For that I would use an Ilsco type. As Don mentioned crimp type are the best but require more advanced tools.
crimp usually much less expensive, if you already have the crimping tool. And likely better overall connection than a mechanically reversible connection.

The other question is to you want to be able to open the connection someday or make additional tap/runs from that junction point? Crimped connections would need to be cut off and results in slightly shorter conductor every time you do so.
 
Or use a crimp on 1 hole lug on each conductor, with SS nut and bolt, 3m tape sticky side out, a bit of insulation pully and then 3 over it all.
With this or the polaris the wires are easier to train into the j box over a barrel crimp splice
 
Or use a crimp on 1 hole lug on each conductor, with SS nut and bolt, 3m tape sticky side out, a bit of insulation pully and then 3 over it all.
I've seen that done and always wondered if the terminals are listed to be used that way. Seem somewhat prevalent in motor connections.
 
I've seen that done and always wondered if the terminals are listed to be used that way. Seem somewhat prevalent in motor connections.
Do they specify anywhere in listing what you must bolt it to? It just has a hole in it to secure it to whatever you are going to attach it to and a crimp barrel to land the conductor in.

I've used two port set screw type lugs as for general splicing before and just insulated it. Sometimes you use what is available even if it isn't what is preferred.
 
I've seen that done and always wondered if the terminals are listed to be used that way. Seem somewhat prevalent in motor connections.
The only way I have ever done motor connections, except on the larger ones I would use Raychem GelCaps in place of 130C and 33+ tape.
 
The only way I have ever done motor connections, except on the larger ones I would use Raychem GelCaps in place of 130C and 33+ tape.
What do you call a large motor? that can vary quite a bit from one person to another.

I myself kind of call 200 maybe 250 hp sort of larger, because that is about all the larger I have worked on, but know in reality these are not all that large to the industry as a whole.

100 hp and less I sort of call common everyday items though. Does sort of stink connecting a 50+ HP motor to 208-240 volts just because the large conductors compared to same thing @ 480 volts, but seem to run into less of those that aren't 480 volts than what it used to be.
 
Split bolt and tape? IMO those things have outlived their usefulness for anything other than bonding and grounding. Ilsco type splice, strip conductor, insert, snug with impact gun, hit with torque wrench, done. Failure rate about zero.
 
Somewhat amazing in my career to see splices (and taps) evolve from poured solder, VC & "tar" tape to split bolts with multiple tapped conductors to crimped connections ro "Polaris" type connectors
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top