I would not give suggestions on this. It seems to me that this is like quicksand.
i'll wade into the quicksand. i have a sand pail and a shovel.
3,500K with a CRI of above 92. 95 would be better. you'll have less arguments about the lighting.
the higher the CRI, the more colors will look the same to everyone.
and.... build into the bid a light meter that does CRI and color temp,
so the facility can figure out what looks good by the numbers, and duplicate it.
without one, it's like trying to tell someone how to parallel park by what they tell you they see in the rear view mirror.
this is the one i use. it's good enough i bought a second one when the first one was stolen.
https://www.asensetek.com/
by the way, do NOT assume color temp and CRI from the manufacturer are accurate. almost all of them lie.
that little meter above has a certificate to national bureau of standards, and it'll trash most lighting manufacturers claims.
i've seen LED's with a stated CRI of 95 actually test at 81. in california, you can't sell lights below 90 CRI, so naturally
all lights are listed above 90. nobody tests, it seems.
there are available LED's with selectable color temperature.
some of them suck, some of them are stellar. do research.
the most amazing light i've ever seen was this.... it can
sing dance, and change color, and the color temp and intensity
does not change on the work surface a lick. fully configurable.
https://www.acuitybrands.com/products/family/rubik
i was in a room with a bunch of those lights in the ceiling, and with my little meter
on the desktop, the light level and color temp didn't vary a lick, and the lights looked
like rubik's cubes all spinning up in the ceiling. 16 bit color was available on those.
ask dave... he was there.
to the OP, don't do all this for free. people spend a LOT of money for lighting consultants.
i know, i sorta are one, in a weird way.