I don't think there is a maximum length. But the rules for portable cords are in article 400. Take particular note of 400.8.
Welcome to the forum.
But let me ask, "asked by whom?" I mean is this a work-related question, or a home-related question?
I am not convinced anything in article 400 applies if it is a temporary thing, such as using the cord to be able to move the washer around to different locations and different positions at those locations.
400.1 Scope. This article covers general requirements, applications,
and construction specifications for flexible cords
and flexible cables.
In my opinion a field made extension cord is a clear example of something article 400 applies to.
90.2 Scope.
(A) Covered. This Code covers the installation of electrical
conductors, equipment, and raceways; signaling and communications
conductors, equipment, and raceways; and optical
fiber cables and raceways for the following:
I can agree but at same time a long cord shouldn't be used as a substitute for fixed wiring - as in lets only put in one receptacle and use a 100 foot cord so we can move this thing to nearly any point within the facility.I am not convinced anything in article 400 applies if it is a temporary thing, such as using the cord to be able to move the washer around to different locations and different positions at those locations.
Would not be a very big facility if the whole thing could be reached with a 100 foot long cord. This kind of situation might well be a safety problem and should be attacked from that end rather than claiming it is an electrical code violation which is a serious stretch.I can agree but at same time a long cord shouldn't be used as a substitute for fixed wiring - as in lets only put in one receptacle and use a 100 foot cord so we can move this thing to nearly any point within the facility.
or just install outlets where they are actually needed.One thing that maybe needs considered is a fixed location for the pump and distributing high pressure piping around the facility instead of cord and plug and extension cords all around for this.
Would not be a very big facility if the whole thing could be reached with a 100 foot long cord. This kind of situation might well be a safety problem and should be attacked from that end rather than claiming it is an electrical code violation which is a serious stretch.
or just install outlets where they are actually needed.
I kind of envisioned a warehouse where they had trucks parked in several parking spots outside and they go out with their pressure washer to wash the trucks down. an extension cord is really the only practical answer.
keep in mind that the length of the extension cord will likely be not much more than the length of the hose feeding the thing with water. the sheer weight and size of the extension cord and hose will enforce a fairly limited length for both.
IMO an extension cord is not part of an installation so pretty much by definition it can't be covered by the NEC.
i do not see how something for temporary use like an extension cord can be considered "installed". it would be like claiming a vacuum cleaner is subject to NEC rules just because it is plugged in.
In my experience AHJs will say 400 applies.
IMO an extension cord is not part of an installation so pretty much by definition it can't be covered by the NEC.
i do not see how something for temporary use like an extension cord can be considered "installed". it would be like claiming a vacuum cleaner is subject to NEC rules just because it is plugged in.
I can just imagine pulling a permit to use my electric chainsaw in the backyard.
The issue of the NEC not being a design manual, is misdirection.
What ever gets designed must meet the NEC requirements, but the NEC requirements, by themselves, are not sufficient for performing a design. Where in the NEC are the requirements for locations and mounting heights of light switch for habitable rooms?
What about a motor that uses a plug for a disconnect?
So where in Article 400 is the answer to the OPs question?In my opinion a field made extension cord is a clear example of something article 400 applies to.
So you argument is that design issues addressed in the NEC do not contradict 90.1(C) because it does not cover all points of design?:huh:
We disagree on that.
Somewhere the line has to be drawn as to whether or not it is temporary, subject to frequent interchange, or otherwise permitted to be cord and plug connected, and when such a cord is truly a substitute for permanent wiring. Then we can maybe determine what if any of art 400 applies. Temporary usually has time limits that go with it.
OSHA would only apply to places of employment, so if we are talking elsewhere - forget OSHA.