RyanMP1011
Member
- Location
- Texas, United States
- Occupation
- Industrial Electrician
Hi all,
I'm a licensed electrician in Texas, and I'm trying to wrap my head around requirements for addressing Aluminum wiring and replacement of CO/ALR devices.
I own a townhouse which was built in 1971. Of course, all of the original wiring was aluminum. Some of the outlet boxes have been pigtailed, years ago, using Copalum crimp connectors, but not all. Some of the boxes have Aluminum wiring landed on CO/ALR devices, a few may even have CU-Only devices with Aluminum wiring landed.
Here is where I have an issue: If I have a CO/ALR receptacle in, for example, the kitchen that is loose or broken and I wish to replace it with a new receptacle, then I have to satisfy the requirements of 406.4(D)(3), (4), and (5). Those would be GFCI/AFCI protection, and Tamper-Resistant receptacles.
406.4(D)(4)(ex.) clarifies that the exception for extensions under 6ft, in 210.12(D)(ex.) shall not apply to replacements of receptacles.
So, even if I had a breaker panel which could accept GFCI/AFCI breakers (I don't, but I do plan on replacing it "eventually"), I'm also hamstrung by the Tamper-Resistant requirement, since there are no CO/ALR Tamper-Resistant receptacles and no exception to CO/ALR devices (although there is one for non-grounding receptacles). It seems like there are no provisions to replace a standard CO/ALR receptacle, since tamper-resistant is essentially required everywhere in a house, now.
Instead of replacing a $5 receptacle, I have to:
- Pigtail aluminum to copper using 2-4 bulky Alumiconn connectors
- Try to shove a dual-fuction AFCI/GFCI outlet into the box, putting even more stress on the aluminum.
- Alternatively, Install a dual-function AFCI/GFCI blank-face device at the breaker box, and a tamper-resistant duplex at the outlet
I also checked my city's amendments to their adoption of the 2020 NEC, and could not find any kind of "grandfather" clauses for this situation. I know this is my own house, and replacing receptacles isn't going to require permit & inspection, but I hate feeling that as a licensed electrician I would be violating the code simply by replacing a busted receptacle for a new, identical one.
Is there something I'm missing here? I really hope I'm just misunderstanding the code and someone can explain this to me, because these seem like absurd requirements for replacing existing CO/ALR receptacles which drive up the cost by at least 10x, while arguably creating more of a fire risk by adding a new point of failure to the aluminum. If a homeowner gets quoted over $500 just to replace one of these outlets (and satisfying the other requirements), I imagine there's a good possibility of that homeowner suddenly becoming very comfortable with replacing the outlet themselves, rules be damned.
I'd appreciate any insight, I'm always looking to better understand the code. Thanks in advance,
Ryan
I'm a licensed electrician in Texas, and I'm trying to wrap my head around requirements for addressing Aluminum wiring and replacement of CO/ALR devices.
I own a townhouse which was built in 1971. Of course, all of the original wiring was aluminum. Some of the outlet boxes have been pigtailed, years ago, using Copalum crimp connectors, but not all. Some of the boxes have Aluminum wiring landed on CO/ALR devices, a few may even have CU-Only devices with Aluminum wiring landed.
Here is where I have an issue: If I have a CO/ALR receptacle in, for example, the kitchen that is loose or broken and I wish to replace it with a new receptacle, then I have to satisfy the requirements of 406.4(D)(3), (4), and (5). Those would be GFCI/AFCI protection, and Tamper-Resistant receptacles.
406.4(D)(4)(ex.) clarifies that the exception for extensions under 6ft, in 210.12(D)(ex.) shall not apply to replacements of receptacles.
So, even if I had a breaker panel which could accept GFCI/AFCI breakers (I don't, but I do plan on replacing it "eventually"), I'm also hamstrung by the Tamper-Resistant requirement, since there are no CO/ALR Tamper-Resistant receptacles and no exception to CO/ALR devices (although there is one for non-grounding receptacles). It seems like there are no provisions to replace a standard CO/ALR receptacle, since tamper-resistant is essentially required everywhere in a house, now.
Instead of replacing a $5 receptacle, I have to:
- Pigtail aluminum to copper using 2-4 bulky Alumiconn connectors
- Try to shove a dual-fuction AFCI/GFCI outlet into the box, putting even more stress on the aluminum.
- Alternatively, Install a dual-function AFCI/GFCI blank-face device at the breaker box, and a tamper-resistant duplex at the outlet
I also checked my city's amendments to their adoption of the 2020 NEC, and could not find any kind of "grandfather" clauses for this situation. I know this is my own house, and replacing receptacles isn't going to require permit & inspection, but I hate feeling that as a licensed electrician I would be violating the code simply by replacing a busted receptacle for a new, identical one.
Is there something I'm missing here? I really hope I'm just misunderstanding the code and someone can explain this to me, because these seem like absurd requirements for replacing existing CO/ALR receptacles which drive up the cost by at least 10x, while arguably creating more of a fire risk by adding a new point of failure to the aluminum. If a homeowner gets quoted over $500 just to replace one of these outlets (and satisfying the other requirements), I imagine there's a good possibility of that homeowner suddenly becoming very comfortable with replacing the outlet themselves, rules be damned.
I'd appreciate any insight, I'm always looking to better understand the code. Thanks in advance,
Ryan