zam
Member
- Location
- New York, NY
But the handle ties alone do not provide an effective common trip. That requires internal components!AKA tandem, piggy-back, cheater or half-size breakers. You have four 240v circuits. Two are 20 amp, and two are 30-amp. The metal parts are to turn off both poles of the breaker should one be manually turned off or if one of them opens for an overload/overcurrent it will take the other one out with it.
Actually, those shown are listed as Common Trip, says so right on the front too. On some Quads, the inner two poles will be common trip, the outer two are not. In order to be listed as those are shown, the breaker mfr must demonstrate to UL that if one pole trips for any reason, the other pole opens. To make those quad arrangements work, the handles, if moved rapidly, will go into a Tripped position, which is something you can't do with regular breakers. So when one pole trips, it jerks the handle on the other pole rapidly and it trips too.But the handle ties alone do not provide an effective common trip. That requires internal components!
Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk
If I remember they also won't fit in the last ___ spaces of the panel?
#7 says T&B on it as well. Not sure what panels those are listed for other then a T&B panel of course, or should I say if you need a breaker for a T&B panel today what is listed to go into it?Also breaker number 5 looks like a Siemens/Murray breaker. If so changed it out for a CH BR :thumbsup:
I stick the stray T&B breakers I come across in BR panels. If I encounter a T&B panel I use BR. I know the listing nazis won't like that but you can ask if I care.#7 says T&B on it as well. Not sure what panels those are listed for other then a T&B panel of course, or should I say if you need a breaker for a T&B panel today what is listed to go into it?
#7 says T&B on it as well. Not sure what panels those are listed for other then a T&B panel of course, or should I say if you need a breaker for a T&B panel today what is listed to go into it?
What point? breakers listed or classified for a specific panel sometimes arc at the bus connection also:happysad:Might be listed, but I assume its not unless proof can be shown. Old vid, seen many times, but still gets the point across :thumbsup:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9hdyYeh4KY
What point? breakers listed or classified for a specific panel sometimes arc at the bus connection also:happysad:
If anything it shows how much more superior bolt on breakers might be:happyyes:
Of course you still need to torque the connection properly.
I'm saying any breaker that physically fits in there can develop a bad connection, including the ones that are listed to go in there. So answer to your question is yes.So your saying the same would have an equal chance of happening with GE breakers in there?
I'm saying any breaker that physically fits in there can develop a bad connection, including the ones that are listed to go in there. So answer to your question is yes.
Even higher dollar QO and CH breakers do that sometimes, and nothing interchanges with those unless it was specifically made to fit (and probably is classified).
I have also seen on occasion an I-line breaker do that. Things just get old and fail sometimes.
Marketing hype. And I say this as a person that mostly prefers to install Square D as well.Sure- but then why does square D issue these warnings if the probability is equal?
http://static.schneider-electric.us/docs/Electrical Distribution/Load Centers/0106BR0502.pdf