Re: Receptacle outlets in closet
Tony,
Roger
[ October 03, 2003, 06:38 PM: Message edited by: roger ]
Tony,
ah yes, but if an inspector says "no" when it is not required and given as an option then "no" is the word. If you read 210-12 (99) it says "receptacle outlets" and if an inspector interpreted it this to mean "receptacles" only, it would be hard to argue.There's very little in the code that prohibits adding extra protections to a system on an optional basis.
I live this statement, only I don't need explicitly in the sentence.As ageneral statement, that which is not explicitly prohibited is allowed
Here we must go back to the inspector saying "no" againThere's a big difference between requirment to install something, and prohibition from installing something.
Roger
[ October 03, 2003, 06:38 PM: Message edited by: roger ]