I wouldn't spend that much; I would just use a large wire-nut.Here most common solution is a polaris connector #2 to a short piece of #10
I have never seen a W/N listed for larger than #6.I wouldn't spend that much; I would just use a large wire-nut.
Okay, a split-bolt.I have never seen a W/N listed for larger than #6.
I would use a Polaris or inline splice.
I have never seen a W/N listed for larger than #6.
I would use a Polaris or inline splice.
Part number ?Another option:
Ilsco SPA-2, morris 90615, Burndy AMS2Part number ?
That's ugly, but I've seen just as bad last a long time.I just ran into this lovely wire:
View attachment 2580801
Which is the wrong way to trim wire. That wire was installed in 1958, on a 70 amp breaker, with
the conductors trimmed to fit. That said in 67 years of service there's apparently be no problem.
yup split bolt or split nut. You can get at home depot. Get some 6 mil rubber splice tape too.Okay, a split-bolt.
Part of me is like its so hack to do that, and the other part is like what is the big deal? ITs probably better overall to trim in fact because you avoid a splice. With aluminum conductors, if you carefully cut around the perimeter with a sawzall blade, about halfway through a "ring" of strands, you can then bend and break them off and it ends up being super neat.When upsizing for voltage drop,
what section of the NEC specifically prohibits trimming stranded conductors?
Electrically it feel like there's more margin to using a trimmed stranded conductor with one connection point,
rather than the reducing tap that's three potential failure points.
I dont understand, can you elaborate?There is no way to assure that the trimmed strands have a tight connection to the untrimmed strands.
I think he means that when you trim only some strands they can separate from the untrimmed strands back from the trim pointI dont understand, can you elaborate?
