Robertschu
New User
- Location
- Chicago
- Occupation
- Electrician
I had an inspector tell my guys today per 2023 nec the fridge and stove receptacles can not be behind the appliances.
If they are GFI's they have to accessible. AFAIKI had an inspector tell my guys today per 2023 nec the fridge and stove receptacles can not be behind the appliances.
True but that's not new for the 2023 so I'm wondering where this info came from.If they are GFI's they have to accessible. AFAIK
I had an inspector tell my guys today per 2023 nec the fridge and stove receptacles can not be behind the appliances.
If the receptacle is GFI protected by a GFI breaker or GFI receptacle feeding it the receptacle behind the refrigerator does not have to be readily accessible.Did 2020 not change so all kitchen receptacles had to be GFCI ? therefore readily accessible ?
Behind a frige would not be readily accessible, correct ?
There is a difference between a GFCI receptacle and a GFCI-protected receptacle.Did 2020 not change so all kitchen receptacles had to be GFCI ? therefore readily accessible ?
Behind a frige would not be readily accessible, correct ?
Understood but that may be where the inspectors comments originated.....There is a difference between a GFCI receptacle and a GFCI-protected receptacle.
No. As long as the fridge outlet is more than 6' from a sink, GFCI protection is not required.Did 2020 not change so all kitchen receptacles had to be GFCI ? therefore readily accessible ?
Behind a frige would not be readily accessible, correct ?
2023 made the change so the GFCI requirement, wording was changed to just Kitchen not kitchen countertop.Did 2020 not change so all kitchen receptacles had to be GFCI ? therefore readily accessible ?
Correct but there are options to avoid the accessibility issue. Many ways to get that protection, receptacle, breaker, load feed from another GFCI device, Blank face GFCI, etc.Behind a frige would not be readily accessible, correct ?
2020 basically same as 2017, in 2023 in a kitchen the 6 ft limit not applicable ALL receptacles must be GFCI protected per 2023 NEC 210.8(A)(6)No. As long as the fridge outlet is more than 6' from a sink, GFCI protection is not required.
A GFCI receptacle outlet behind a refrigerator is probably not readily accessible.
Ron
Accessible, Readily (Readily Accessible). Capable of being
reached quickly for operation, renewal, or inspections without
requiring those to whom ready access is requisite to take
actions such as to use tools (other than keys), to climb over or
under, to remove obstacles, or to resort to portable ladders,
and so forth. (CMP-1)
But I haven't seen one yet that once you adjusted the levelers that it was still able to roll.If a fridge is on rollers, it is "readily accessible" per the NEC definition.
But what will you do for the 23 code? Take the fridge out of the "kitchen" area?took out the GFCI receptacle, because it was on a fridge and I don't want to lose all my food again...)
They have audible alarms in gfi's that sound on trip.But I haven't seen one yet that once you adjusted the levelers that it was still able to roll.
But what will you do for the 23 code? Take the fridge out of the "kitchen" area?
If anyone comes to inspect my electrical again while I’m here, it goes back in. Not that big of a deal.But I haven't seen one yet that once you adjusted the levelers that it was still able to roll.
But what will you do for the 23 code? Take the fridge out of the "kitchen" area?
I see rolling the refrigerator out to access the GFCI as "removing an obstacle" and it would get a red tag around here.If a fridge is on rollers, it is "readily accessible" per the NEC definition.
Had this exact argument with an AHJ once, he had never read the definition of "Readily Accessible" before, in fact he was not aware there was a definition in the NEC. I had my wife pull the fridge away from the wall, he accepted it.
(Then I took out the GFCI receptacle, because it was on a fridge and I don't want to lose all my food again...)
I definitely agree!I see rolling the refrigerator out to access the GFCI as "removing an obstacle" and it would get a red tag around here.
How does a definition include an ambiguous phrase like "and so forth"?