This situation boils down to drinking Poison A or Poison B. On the one hand, we're faced with losing money on callbacks for these fraudulent devices and remaining the guinea pig for manufacturers 15+ years after they were introduced. On the other hand, removing them opens one up to liability. Personally, I have no problem removing them after the fact, especially if there's no wiring error in the circuit and is only nuisance tripping. I refuse to be a party to this fraud of the AFCI and these lying, thieving manufacturers.
Besides, there's a handful of states that don't require them at all, Michigan being chief among them. How is it "safe" in one state bordering Michigan but I cross some invisible boundary into Michigan and suddenly it's "unsafe" because they don't require AFCI's? (That's how the safety narrative goes from the industry mouth pieces.) What about the countless billions of existing circuits that aren't AFCI protected in existence? These "safety" standards are arbitrary at best.