nyhockey
Senior Member
- Location
- long island, ny
Not saying I like but that is life here. We have to buy correctly and watch man hours
bottom line is at best you get what you pay for.. If you pay for the high quality you have a degree of quality and assurance that the job will be done at a high quality . If you cut corners you have noone to blame but yourself for irritation factor.
"if it were heart surgery would you take the lowest bid?"
I guess the primary reason for asking this I could think of would be to create a basline for all of the quotes from a labor perspective.
Bottom line is at BEST you get what you pay for.. If you pay for the high quality you have a degree of quality and assurance that the job will be done at a high quality . If you cut corners you have noone to blame but yourself for irritation factor.
Agreed. Usually, if they insist, I'll do a breakdown that totals substantially more than my final price, which I call a whole-job discount. If they want only parts of it done, the higher prices apply, and the prices are already documented.Sometimes I give a price breakdown but, when I do, I say it is for information only and the prices given are valid only for the whole scope of supply.
So, they can compare our pricing with others but they can't cherry pick the bits that suit them best.
Agreed. Usually, if they insist, I'll do a breakdown that totals substantially more than my final price, which I call a whole-job discount. If they want only parts of it done, the higher prices apply, and the prices are already documented.
I also state that I price work as assemblies which include materials and labor, and not as a materials sub-total and a labor sub-total. That helps avoid the "what if I supply the materials" question . . . sometimes. If they insist, see Rule #1.
If I decide to shop for better material prices once I get the contract, I want to be the one who benefits from the time and effort, since that time isn't paid for by the customer. Not directly, anyway. It's certainly not in the breakdown.
Yes, we shop around also or try to negotiate better discounts with our suppliers.If I decide to shop for better material prices once I get the contract, I want to be the one who benefits from the time and effort, since that time isn't paid for by the customer. Not directly, anyway. It's certainly not in the breakdown.
I work in an industrial plant where I'm constantly requesting quotes from outside electrical contractors to perform electrcial installation/service/upgrades etc.... Typically these quotes are submitted as a lump sum cost including both the labor, material cost and everything rolled into one price.
Is it typical, or would it be out of the norm to request a labor, and material cost breakdown on these quotes? If not to specifically but rather to see the total amount of man hr budgeted as well as a total material cost including whatever the markup is? This way when comparing quotes you can compare like aspects of the quote to see who is trying to get away with quoting less hrs to take shortcuts etc...
Just wanted to hear others thoughts.