brian john said:If the first rod has a resistance reading to earth of 1000 ohms drive a second rod and walk away.
Why are you designing to 5 ohms?
dereckbc said:It could be 1000 and it is acceptable to the NEC.
WHY? What do you expect to achieve by having a 5 ohm reading as opposed to a 100 ohm reading?kfenn22 said:I typically design for 5 ohms, but I'm fighting a contractor right now, and he is saying that we only have to have 25 ohms.
Thanks.
You guys the same person?
But is there a good technical reason to support that?IEEE 142 requires 5 ohms or less for large commercial or industrial systems
don_resqcapt19 said:But is there a good technical reason to support that?
Then your EC is correct, using a # 1 vs. a 2/0 will not change a thing in respect to impedance or performance, all it effects is cost. He saved you some $$$ assuming he subtrated the cost difference. On the other hand if the EC bidded and charged you for for 2/0 well... IMHO I would give him two options.kfenn22 said:5 ohms is what the customer wanted, Following the IEEE.
This is a build/design; I mean Design build project.
Long story short, the EC got caught putting in #1 awg instead of 2/0 for the ground loop. Now he wants me to write letter approving his VE from the orginal design.
I'm sticking with the orginal design.
Thanks for the help.
That is not enough reason for justification. There has to be a specific reason to justify that requirement. For most commercial applications, you cannot justify a low impedance for any technical or performance reasons. It is only when you cross the line of medium to high voltage, or special purpose requirements like communications facilitieswith integrating lightning protection schemes. Otherwise there is no purpose or justification.zog said:IEEE 142 requires 5 ohms or less for large commercial or industrial systems and 1 ohm or less for generating or transmission stations (Unless otherwise specified by the owner)
