I can't think of any NEC violation, but sure would be a poor design issue in most peoples minds.This obviously does not
Look code compliant. Article? Ul listing?View attachment 16332View attachment 16333
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And exactly what makes you say that... :huh:Looks like something Cletis Electric would do.
For the one with four cables, have to go with 110.3(B) and failure to heed manufacturers instructions.
For the one with four cables, have to go with 110.3(B) and failure to heed manufacturers instructions.
OK those are NEC issues, but can you come up with anything on entry through the panel cover?Prolly.
I think that concrete shelf/ledge is a 110.26 working space violation also.
OK those are NEC issues, but can you come up with anything on entry through the panel cover?
OK those are NEC issues, but can you come up with anything on entry through the panel cover?
Maybe accessibility issue? How can you pull the cover off to work on the panel?
Also, 110.(A)(8) and 110.3(B)
There is a possibility that makes this somewhat more acceptable.Did you take these pictures yourself?
It looks like somebody put in a new panel, converted the old panel into a junction box, then refed the circuits contained therein. Maybe the door is now access to the junction box with no intention of ever taking the entire cover off again. You can bolt the door down to require tools to open it.
There is a possibility that makes this somewhat more acceptable.
Me says Nae, nothing would make this acceptable or "in a workman like manner".There is a possibility that makes this somewhat more acceptable.
Do you live and or/work in Ohio?Me says Nae, nothing would make this acceptable or "in a workman like manner".
Do you live and or/work in Ohio?
If not, you may be surprised at what passes for acceptable around here if you ever visit.![]()
What is workman like is pretty debatable though.Me says Nae, nothing would make this acceptable or "in a workman like manner".