Sparky09 said:Hi i am a electrician apprentice and i was wondering if it was legal to staple romex to dry wall in a half finished garage.only one wall has dry wall ceiling and other walls are bare.[/QUOTE
Many years ago lots of garages that had open studs (Framework) were wired with romex (Usually the old type romex) In Southern California this is no longer permitted. In fact if a residential service is located on a garage wall with open studs, the usual method is to have carpenters build a chase that leads to the wall where the house proper begins. Then all of the home runs are protected and enclosed by this chase. This also eliminates having to change wiring types. For example from flex, bx, or other, to romex etc. Most places that I know about do not allow exposed romex in a garage or under a raised wooden floor. Hope this helps.
cadishead
cadishead said:Most places that I know about do not allow exposed romex in a garage or under a raised wooden floor.
7-45 Log #3087 NEC-P07 Final Action: Reject
(334.10(3))
Submitter: Joseph A. Hertel, Safety and Buildings
Recommendation: Substitute the following wording for 334.10 (intro)(3): Other structures permitted to be of Types III, IV and V construction except as prohibited in 334.12.
Substantiation: The language requiring that ?cables shall be concealed
within walls, floors, or ceilings that provide a thermal barrier of material that has at least a 15-minute finish rating? is not complied with and largely ignored in practice. Compliance would require that all installations in detached garages (Type V structures) where NM cables are installed, dairy and horse facilities (Type V structures) where UF cable is used and many other stand alone structures of Types III, IV or V construction would require gypsum wallboard to provide the 15-minute finish rating.
Panel Meeting Action: Reject
Panel Statement: Violations of the NEC requirements are not reason for changing requirements of the Code. The present text is inclusive of all ?Other Structures?. The substantiation addresses only unfinished garages and agriculture installations where Type UF cable is preferred. No substantiation has been submitted to address why the 15- minute finish rating for these and other commercial and non-residential installations should not be required. The panel advises the submitter that these installations might be more appropriately addressed under the Type UF Cable Article.
Number Eligible to Vote: 14
Ballot Results: Affirmative: 13 Negative: 1
No substantiation has been submitted to address why the 15- minute finish rating for these and other commercial and non-residential installations should not be required.
iwire said:They are telling us that NM needs a 15- minute finish rating even in a garage.
peter d said:What about a garage within a dwelling unit?
iwire said:I don't know, aren't those generally sheet rocked for fire code?
peter d said:I see and work in many homes that have garages with exposed framing.
iwire said:Looks like you need to start using MC, MCAP or AC cable.
Or you could be bold and go with PVC coated, stainless RMC. :grin:
iwire said:Or you could be bold and go with PVC coated, stainless RMC. :grin:
coulnt have said it better. i just did one about a month ago, nothing looks better than a good pipe job.480sparky said:I revel in an open-frame garage. Get out the EMT bender!